NatureServe Explorer logo.An Online Encyclopedia of Life
Search
 
Ecological System Comprehensive Report: Record 1 of 1 selected. View Glossary
<< Previous | Next >>

Classification
Scientific Name: Northeastern Interior Pine Barrens
Unique Identifier: CES202.590

Search for Images on Google
Summary: These pine barrens occur on glacial sandplains of the inland regions of the northeastern U.S., with a disjunction to the distinctive till plain shrublands in the Poconos of eastern Pennsylvania. Substrates include outwash plains, stabilized sand dunes, and glacial till. The soils are consequently coarse-textured, acidic, mostly well-drained to xeric, and low in nutrients. Pinus rigida is the usual dominant, and cover may range from closed-canopy forest to (more typically) open woodlands. Quercus rubra, Pinus strobus, and Betula populifolia are common associates. A tall-shrub layer of Quercus ilicifolia and/or Quercus prinoides is commonly present, although portions of some barrens (or occasionally the entire barrens) lack the scrub oak component. A well-developed low-shrub layer is typical, with lowbush Vaccinium spp., Gaylussacia baccata, and Comptonia peregrina characteristic, with Rhododendron canadense characteristic on the slightly more mesic microsites of the Poconos. The system is often a physiognomic patchwork, ranging from nearly closed-canopy forest to open pine woodlands, to scrub oak shrublands, to herbaceous/dwarf-shrub frost pockets. Grassy areas dominated by Schizachyrium scoparium with Lupinus perennis, Lespedeza capitata, and other forbs provide habitat for several rare invertebrates. Small changes in elevation can create pockets with saturated soil, where shrubs such as Corylus americana, Cephalanthus occidentalis, Vaccinium corymbosum, and Alnus spp. form dense cover. These barrens always have a history of recurrent fires, and fire is required to maintain them.

Classification Approach: International Terrestrial Ecological Systems Classification (ITESC)

Classification Comments: This system can include patches, or sometimes larger areas, of mesic pitch pine - shrub vegetation. For instance, Pennsylvania's "mesic till barrens" are somewhat less dry than the typical barrens in this system, but fit otherwise. Elsewhere in these barrens, wet pitch pine pockets can occur in (usually small) topographic depressions.

Similar Ecological Systems
Unique Identifier Name
CES201.718 Laurentian Pine-Oak Barrens
CES203.269 Northern Atlantic Coastal Plain Pitch Pine Barrens


Component Associations
Association Unique ID Association Name
CEGL005046 Pinus rigida / Vaccinium spp. - Gaylussacia baccata Woodland
CEGL006025 Pinus rigida / Quercus ilicifolia / Lespedeza capitata Woodland
CEGL006157 Pinus rigida - Quercus ilicifolia - Rhododendron canadense Woodland
CEGL006203 Pinus rigida / Quercus ilicifolia / Piptatheropsis pungens Woodland
CEGL006259 Pinus strobus - Pinus resinosa - Pinus rigida Forest
CEGL006290 Pinus rigida - Quercus (velutina, montana) Forest
CEGL006393 Vaccinium angustifolium / Schizachyrium scoparium - Carex lucorum Shrub Grassland



Classifiers

Land Cover Class: Forest and Woodland
Spatial Pattern: Large patch
Natural/Seminatural: No
Vegetated ( > 10% vascular cover):
Upland: Yes
Wetland: No
Isolated Wetland: No

Diagnostic Classifiers
Primary Classifier Secondary Classifier
Sandplains/Glacial Outwash or Flats  
Glaciated  
Oligotrophic Soil  
Acidic Soil  
Sand Soil Texture  
F-Landscape/Medium Intensity  
Pinus rigida  

Non-diagnostic Classifiers
Primary Classifier Secondary Classifier
Lowland  
Forest and Woodland (Treed)  
Ustic  

At-Risk Species Reported for this Ecological System
Scientific Name
  (Common Name)
NatureServe Global Status U.S. Endangered Species Act Status
Callophrys irus
  (Frosted Elfin)
G3  
Plebejus melissa samuelis
  (Karner Blue)
G5T2 LE: Listed endangered

Vegetation Composition (incomplete)
Species Name Rounded Global Status Growth Form Stratum Char-
acter-
istic
Domi-nant Con-stant
Cover Class %
Con-
stancy
%
Betula populifolia G5 Broad-leaved deciduous tree Tree canopy    
 
 
Quercus ilicifolia G5 Broad-leaved deciduous tree Tree canopy    
 
 
Pinus rigida G5 Needle-leaved tree Tree canopy    
 
 
Comptonia peregrina G5 Broad-leaved deciduous shrub Short shrub/sapling    
 
 
Hieracium venosum G5 Flowering forb Herb (field)    
 
 
Lespedeza capitata G5 Flowering forb Herb (field)    
 
 
Lupinus perennis G5 Flowering forb Herb (field)    
 
 
Schizachyrium scoparium G5 Graminoid Herb (field)    
 
 


Animal Species Reported for this Ecological System
Scientific Name
  (Common Name)
Global Status U.S. Endangered Species Act Status Charact-
eristic
Exotic
Atrytonopsis hianna
  (Dusted Skipper)
G4G5      
Callophrys irus
  (Frosted Elfin)
G3      
Callophrys niphon
  (Eastern Pine Elfin)
G5      
Coluber constrictor
  (North American Racer)
G5      
Erynnis persius
  (Persius Duskywing)
G5      
Hemileuca maia
  (Eastern Buckmoth)
G5      
Hesperia metea
  (Cobweb Skipper)
G4      
Heterodon platirhinos
  (Eastern Hog-nosed Snake)
G5      
Peromyscus leucopus
  (White-footed Deermouse)
G5      
Plebejus melissa samuelis
  (Karner Blue)
G5T2 LE: Listed endangered    
Satyrium edwardsii
  (Edwards' Hairstreak)
G5      


Distribution
Color legend for Distribution Map
Nation: United States
United States Distribution: CT, MA, ME, NH, NY, PA, RI, VT
Global Range: This system is restricted to interior south-central New England; Colchester, Vermont; eastern New York; and the Pennsylvania Poconos.

Biogeographic Divisions
Division Code and Name Primary Occurrence Status
202-Central Interior and Appalachian C: Confident or certain

The Nature Conservancy's Conservation Ecoregions
Code Name Occurrence Status
60 High Allegheny Plateau Confident or certain
61 Lower New England / Northern Piedmont Confident or certain
63 Northern Appalachian-Boreal Forest Confident or certain
64 St. Lawrence-Champlain Valley Confident or certain

MRLC 2000 Mapzones
Code Name Occurrence Status
60 Chesapeake Bay Never was there
61 Northern Appalachia Never was there
64 Northeastern Highlands Confident or certain
65 Connecticut River Basin and Highlands Confident or certain
66 The North Woods Confident or certain

National Mapping
ESLF Code (Ecological System Lifeform): 4257
ESP Code (Environmental Site Potential): 1354
EVT Code (Existing Vegetation Type): 2354

West Landfire Legend: No
East Landfire Legend: Yes

Authors/Contributors
Element Description Edition Date: 14Jan2014
Element Description Author(s): S.C. Gawler and L.A. Sneddon

Ecological data developed by NatureServe and its network of natural heritage programs (see Local Programs) and other contributors and cooperators (see Sources).


References
  • Andresen J. W. 1959. A study of pseudo-nanism in Pinus rigida Mill. Ecological Monographs 29:309-332.

  • Burns, R. M., and B. H. Honkala, technical coordinators. 1990a. Silvics of North America: Volume 1. Conifers. Agriculture Handbook 654. USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC. 675 pp.

  • Comer, P., D. Faber-Langendoen, R. Evans, S. Gawler, C. Josse, G. Kittel, S. Menard, C. Nordman, M. Pyne, M. Reid, M. Russo, K. Schulz, K. Snow, J. Teague, and R. White. 2003-present. Ecological systems of the United States: A working classification of U.S. terrestrial systems. NatureServe, Arlington, VA.

  • Copenheaver, C. A., A. S. White, and W. A. Patterson, III. 2000. Vegetation development in a southern Maine pitch pine - scrub oak barren. Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 127:19-32.

  • Eberhardt, R. W., and R. E. Latham. 2000. Relationships among vegetation, surficial geology and soil water content at the Pocono Mesic Till Barrens. Journal of the Torrey Botanical Club 127:115-124.

  • Edinger, G. J., D. J. Evans, S. Gebauer, T. G. Howard, D. M. Hunt, and A. M. Olivero, editors. 2014a. Ecological communities of New York state. Second edition. A revised and expanded edition of Carol Reschke's ecological communities of New York state. New York Natural Heritage Program, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, NY.

  • Eyre, F. H., editor. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Society of American Foresters, Washington, DC. 148 pp.

  • Fike, J. 1999. Terrestrial and palustrine plant communities of Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania Natural Diversity Inventory. Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Recreation, Bureau of Forestry, Harrisburg, PA. 86 pp.

  • Forman, R. T. T. 1979. Pine Barrens: Ecosystems and landscape. Academy Press, New York. 601 pp.

  • Gawler, S. C., and A. Cutko. 2010. Natural landscapes of Maine: A classification of vegetated natural communities and ecosystems. Maine Natural Areas Program, Department of Conservation, Augusta.

  • Gray, V. E., and C. Dawson. 2004. Albany Pine Bush Preserve: A case study using concepts from the limits of acceptable change framework. Pages 145-149 in: General Technical Report NE-326. Proceedings of the 2004 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium, USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station, Newton Square, PA.

  • Kurczewski, F. E., and H. F. Boyle. 2000. Historical changes in the Pine Barrens of central Suffolk County, New York. Northeast Naturalist 7:95-112.

  • LANDFIRE [Landfire National Vegetation Dynamics Database]. 2007a. Landfire National Vegetation Dynamics Models. Landfire Project, USDA Forest Service, U.S. Department of Interior. (January - last update) [http://www.LANDFIRE.gov/index.php] (accessed 8 February 2007).

  • Latham, R. E., J. E. Thompson, A. Sugden-Newbery, and P. Stoll. No date. Spatial analysis of vegetation change in a mesic shrubland: Effects of geomorphology, fire history and forest proximity. [in preparation for Landscape Ecology]

  • Latham, R. E., J. E. Thompson, S. A. Riley, and A. W. Wibiralske. 1996. The Pocono till barrens: Shrub savanna persisting on soils favoring forest. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 123:330-349.

  • Little, S. 1979c. Fire and plant succession in the New Jersey Pine Barrens. Pages 297-313 in: R. T. T. Forman, editor. Pine Barrens: Ecosystem and Landscape. Academic Press, Inc., Orlando, FL.

  • MNHESP [Massachusetts Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program]. 2007. Natural community fact sheet: Pitch pine / scrub oak communities. Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program, Massachusetts Division of Fisheries & Wildlife, Westborough, MA. [http://www.mass.gov/eea/docs/dfg/nhesp/natural-communities-facts/pitch-pine-scrub-oak-commun.pdf]

  • Maurice, K. R., J. M. Welch, C. P. Brown, and R. E. Latham. 2004. Pocono mesic till barrens in retreat: Topography, fire and forest contagion effects. Landscape Ecology 19(6):603-620.

  • McCormick, J. 1979. The vegetation of the New Jersey Pine Barrens. In: R. T. T. Formann, editor. Pine Barrens: Ecosystem and landscape. Academic Press, New York.

  • Meilleur, A., J. Brisson, and A. Bouchard. 1997. Ecological analysis of the northernmost population of pitch pine (Pinus rigida). Canadian Journal of Forest Research 27:1342-1350.

  • Motzkin, G., S. C. Ciccarello, and D. R. Foster. 2002. Frost pockets on a level sand plain: Does variation in microclimate help maintain persistent vegetation patterns? Journal of the Torrey Botanical Club 129:154-163.

  • Motzkin, G., W. A. Patterson, III, and D. R. Foster. 1999. A historical perspective on pitch pine - scrub oak communities in the Connecticut Valley of Massachusetts. Ecosystems 2:255-273.

  • NatureServe. 2005b. International Ecological Classification Standard: Terrestrial Ecological Classifications. Terrestrial ecological systems of the Northeast Region, U.S. draft legend for Landfire project: Northeast Rapid Assessment Model Zone. NatureServe, Arlington, VA. 61 pp.

  • Olsvig, L. S. 1980. A comparative study of northeastern Pine Barrens vegetation. Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY. 479 pp.

  • Petraitis, P. S., and R. E. Latham. 1999. The importance of scale in testing the origins of alternative community states. Ecology 80:429-442.

  • Schweitzer, D. S., and T. J. Rawinski. 1988. Element stewardship abstract for northeastern pitch pines / scrub oak barrens. Unpublished report. The Nature Conservancy. 21 pp.

  • Seischab, F. K., and J. M. Bernard. 1996. Pitch pine (Pinus rigida Mill.) communities in the Hudson Valley region of New York. The American Midland Naturalist 136:42-56.

  • Sperduto, D. D., and W. F. Nichols. 2004. Natural communities of New Hampshire: A guide and classification. New Hampshire Natural Heritage Bureau, DRED Division of Forests and Lands, Concord. 242 pp.

  • Swain, P. C., and J. B. Kearsley. 2011. Classification of the natural communities of Massachusetts. Version 1.4. Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program, Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, Westborough, MA. [http://www.mass.gov/eea/agencies/dfg/dfw/natural-heritage/natural-communities/classification-of-natural-communities.html]

  • Thompson, J. E. 1995. Interrelationships among vegetation dynamics, fire, surficial geology and topography of the southern Pocono Plateau, Monroe County, Pennsylvania. M.S. thesis, University of Pennsylvania. 159 pp.

  • USFS [U.S. Forest Service]. 2002b. Fire Effects Information System [Online]. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). [http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/] (December 2002).

  • Wibiralske, A. W., R. E. Latham, and A. Johnson. 2004. A biogeochemical analysis of the Pocono till barrens and adjacent hardwood forest underlain by Wisconsinan and Illinoian till in northeastern Pennsylvania. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 34:1819-1832.


Use Guidelines and Citation

The Small Print: Trademark, Copyright, Citation Guidelines, Restrictions on Use, and Information Disclaimer.

Note: All species and ecological community data presented in NatureServe Explorer at http://explorer.natureserve.org were updated to be current with NatureServe's central databases as of March 2019.
Note: This report was printed on

Trademark Notice: "NatureServe", NatureServe Explorer, The NatureServe logo, and all other names of NatureServe programs referenced herein are trademarks of NatureServe. Any other product or company names mentioned herein are the trademarks of their respective owners.

Copyright Notice: Copyright © 2019 NatureServe, 2511 Richmond (Jefferson Davis) Highway, Suite 930, Arlington, VA 22202, U.S.A. All Rights Reserved. Each document delivered from this server or web site may contain other proprietary notices and copyright information relating to that document. The following citation should be used in any published materials which reference the web site.

Citation for data on website including State Distribution, Watershed, and Reptile Range maps:
NatureServe. 2019. NatureServe Explorer: An online encyclopedia of life [web application]. Version 7.1. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia. Available http://explorer.natureserve.org. (Accessed:

Citation for Bird Range Maps of North America:
Ridgely, R.S., T.F. Allnutt, T. Brooks, D.K. McNicol, D.W. Mehlman, B.E. Young, and J.R. Zook. 2003. Digital Distribution Maps of the Birds of the Western Hemisphere, version 1.0. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia, USA.

Acknowledgement Statement for Bird Range Maps of North America:
"Data provided by NatureServe in collaboration with Robert Ridgely, James Zook, The Nature Conservancy - Migratory Bird Program, Conservation International - CABS, World Wildlife Fund - US, and Environment Canada - WILDSPACE."

Citation for Mammal Range Maps of North America:
Patterson, B.D., G. Ceballos, W. Sechrest, M.F. Tognelli, T. Brooks, L. Luna, P. Ortega, I. Salazar, and B.E. Young. 2003. Digital Distribution Maps of the Mammals of the Western Hemisphere, version 1.0. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia, USA.

Acknowledgement Statement for Mammal Range Maps of North America:
"Data provided by NatureServe in collaboration with Bruce Patterson, Wes Sechrest, Marcelo Tognelli, Gerardo Ceballos, The Nature Conservancy-Migratory Bird Program, Conservation International-CABS, World Wildlife Fund-US, and Environment Canada-WILDSPACE."

Citation for Amphibian Range Maps of the Western Hemisphere:
IUCN, Conservation International, and NatureServe. 2004. Global Amphibian Assessment. IUCN, Conservation International, and NatureServe, Washington, DC and Arlington, Virginia, USA.

Acknowledgement Statement for Amphibian Range Maps of the Western Hemisphere:
"Data developed as part of the Global Amphibian Assessment and provided by IUCN-World Conservation Union, Conservation International and NatureServe."

NOTE: Full metadata for the Bird Range Maps of North America is available at:
http://www.natureserve.org/library/birdDistributionmapsmetadatav1.pdf.

Full metadata for the Mammal Range Maps of North America is available at:
http://www.natureserve.org/library/mammalsDistributionmetadatav1.pdf.

Restrictions on Use: Permission to use, copy and distribute documents delivered from this server is hereby granted under the following conditions:
  1. The above copyright notice must appear in all copies;
  2. Any use of the documents available from this server must be for informational purposes only and in no instance for commercial purposes;
  3. Some data may be downloaded to files and altered in format for analytical purposes, however the data should still be referenced using the citation above;
  4. No graphics available from this server can be used, copied or distributed separate from the accompanying text. Any rights not expressly granted herein are reserved by NatureServe. Nothing contained herein shall be construed as conferring by implication, estoppel, or otherwise any license or right under any trademark of NatureServe. No trademark owned by NatureServe may be used in advertising or promotion pertaining to the distribution of documents delivered from this server without specific advance permission from NatureServe. Except as expressly provided above, nothing contained herein shall be construed as conferring any license or right under any NatureServe copyright.
Information Warranty Disclaimer: All documents and related graphics provided by this server and any other documents which are referenced by or linked to this server are provided "as is" without warranty as to the currentness, completeness, or accuracy of any specific data. NatureServe hereby disclaims all warranties and conditions with regard to any documents provided by this server or any other documents which are referenced by or linked to this server, including but not limited to all implied warranties and conditions of merchantibility, fitness for a particular purpose, and non-infringement. NatureServe makes no representations about the suitability of the information delivered from this server or any other documents that are referenced to or linked to this server. In no event shall NatureServe be liable for any special, indirect, incidental, consequential damages, or for damages of any kind arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information contained in any documents provided by this server or in any other documents which are referenced by or linked to this server, under any theory of liability used. NatureServe may update or make changes to the documents provided by this server at any time without notice; however, NatureServe makes no commitment to update the information contained herein. Since the data in the central databases are continually being updated, it is advisable to refresh data retrieved at least once a year after its receipt. The data provided is for planning, assessment, and informational purposes. Site specific projects or activities should be reviewed for potential environmental impacts with appropriate regulatory agencies. If ground-disturbing activities are proposed on a site, the appropriate state natural heritage program(s) or conservation data center can be contacted for a site-specific review of the project area (see Visit Local Programs).

Feedback Request: NatureServe encourages users to let us know of any errors or significant omissions that you find in the data through (see Contact Us). Your comments will be very valuable in improving the overall quality of our databases for the benefit of all users.

Copyright 2019
NatureServe
Version 7.1 (2 February 2009)
Data last updated: March 2019