- Esper, 1788
Taxonomic Status: Accepted
Related ITIS Name(s):
Papilio anchisiades Esper, 1788 (TSN 777708)
Unique Identifier: ELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.109877
Element Code: IILEP94290
Informal Taxonomy: Animals, Invertebrates
- Butterflies and Moths
- Butterflies and Skippers
Genus Size: D - Medium to large genus (21+ species)
Check this box to expand all report sections:
Concept Reference: Opler, P. A., and A. D. Warren. 2002. Butterflies of North America. 2. Scientific Names List for Butterfly Species of North America, north of Mexico. C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado. 79 pp.
Concept Reference Code: B02OPL01EHUS
Name Used in Concept Reference: Papilio anchisiades
Global Status: G5
Global Status Last Reviewed: 01Sep1998
Global Status Last Changed: 01Sep1998
Rounded Global Status: G5 - Secure
Reasons: Common in Latin America. Presumed to be a temporary resident in united States.
Nation: United States
National Status: NNR
U.S. & Canada State/Province Status
Arizona (SNR), Kansas (SNR), Texas (SNR)
NatureServe Global Conservation Status Factors
Range Extent: >2,500,000 square km (greater than 1,000,000 square miles)
Range Extent Comments: Only US population was recently established in lower Rio Grande valley. The species is also present south to Bolivia.
Number of Occurrences: 81 to >300
Population Size: 10,000 to >1,000,000 individuals
Other NatureServe Conservation Status Information
(>2,500,000 square km (greater than 1,000,000 square miles))
Only US population was recently established in lower Rio Grande valley. The species is also present south to Bolivia.
U.S. States and Canadian Provinces
Endemism: occurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
Range MapNo map available.
U.S. & Canada State/Province Distribution
AZ, KS, TX
Ecology & Life History
Locally Migrant: N
Long Distance Migrant: N
Terrestrial Habitat(s): Forest - Hardwood, Suburban/orchard, Woodland - Hardwood
Habitat Comments: Mostly Citrus groves, gardens, hedges in Texas; tropical forests etc. in main range.
Not yet assessed
Not yet assessed
Group Name: Swallowtails (most Papilionidae).
Use Class: Not applicable
Minimum Criteria for an Occurrence: A location where the species occurs, or has occurred with potential for persistence or regular recurrence; minimally including suitable habitat with presence verified by a specimen or definitively identifiable photograph. For certain relatively easy species sight records might occasionally be used.
Mapping Guidance: For some of the more common mobile landscape level species utilizing very common habitats it may be impossible to define realistic EOs. This would very commonly be the case with species such as P. glaucus, canadensis, troilus, polyxenes asterias, zelicaon and the few migratory ones like Battus philenor. The species will usually be common or transient in the area and therefore not tracked.
Consult the habitat and food comments fields for species-specific information on what constitutes suitable habitat when mapping occurrences. For island or other patchy metapopulations map major larval foodplant concentrations and any critical nectar areas.
Separation Barriers: These will often be unknown, but hot lowland deserts may be treated as barriers for montane species. Developed area should not be assumed to be barriers and are usually unsuitable, but sometimes suitable, habitat.
Separation Distance for Unsuitable Habitat: 5 km
Separation Distance for Suitable Habitat: 20 km
Alternate Separation Procedure:
In very many cases, especially in the drier parts of western North America, populations will be confined to clearly definable, discrete landscape features such as riparian areas, canyons, ridgelines or even irrigated settled areas. In most such cases it is very reasonable simply to treat each canyon , ridge, etc., occurrence as a separate EO by using suitable habitat distances within them. If the landscape features are separated by hot arid terrain consider whether such terrain is a barrier rather than merely unsuitable and if that seems to be the case separations distances as small as 1 km may sometimes be appropriate. Although some species do move between islands, in general it is reasonable to treat populations on islands as separate EOs. In order to define practical EOs, for riparian species the unsuitable habitat distance might be applied over marginally suitable habitat.
Separation Justification: These figures are educated guesses based on the easily observable fact that most swallowtails move widely. Adults can commonly be directly observed to move a few hundred meters in a minute or so. Swallowtails are very commonly seen (especially in gardens) away from breeding habitats and are known to move between habitats. In some species both sexes may move substantial distances to encounter mates on hilltops. There are good data for some of the rarer species (which will have their own Specs) but merely many casual observations for most of the common ones. P. aristodemus ponceanus flies from one island to the next. Some taxa occasionally show up 500-1000 kilometers out of range. Isolated patches of foodplants often get larvae even where adults are only occasionally seen. Some naturalists plant larval foodplants in gardens and are quite successful in getting oviposition of species like P. polyxenes, zelicaon and B. philenor. These species wander widely and most use a wide range of habitats, other use a more limited range but still manage to occupy most patches over time. For species which feed on common or even dominant forest trees or shrubs occurrences may cover hundreds of square kilometers, sometimes much more, with no logical subdivisions. Individual male territories or home ranges would not be a logical basis for EOs for such species since insect occurrences are based on populations. Therefore while arbitrary these figures reflect that most swallowtails are wide ranging more or less landscape level species. It seems unlikely that permanent populations would occur in less than several hundred hectares and that may be too small for some.
Inferred Minimum Extent of Habitat Use (when actual extent is unknown): 2 km
Inferred Minimum Extent Justification: This applies only in suitable habitat and if larval foodplants are widely distributed. Do not use to extend occurrences beyond breeding habitat. However, given suitable habitat and dozens to thousands of highly mobile adults it would be unreasonable to assume absence from suitable habitat with established populations as close as 2 kilometers and at least marginal habitat in intervening area.
Author: Schweitzer, D.F.
U.S. Invasive Species Impact Rank (I-Rank)
Not yet assessed
NatureServe Conservation Status Factors Edition Date: 09Jun1987
NatureServe Conservation Status Factors Author: Opler, P.A., & D. Schweitzer
Element Ecology & Life History Edition Date: 09May2001
Zoological data developed by NatureServe and its network of
natural heritage programs (see Local Programs) and other contributors and cooperators (see Sources).
- Opler, P. A., and A. D. Warren. 2002. Butterflies of North America. 2. Scientific Names List for Butterfly Species of North America, north of Mexico. C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado. 79 pp.
- Pelham, J. P. 2008. A catalogue of the butterflies of the United States and Canada with a complete bibliography of the descriptive and systematic literature. The Journal of Research on the Lepidoptera. Volume 40. 658 pp.
Use Guidelines & Citation
Use Guidelines and Citation
The Small Print: Trademark, Copyright, Citation Guidelines, Restrictions on Use, and Information Disclaimer.
Note: All species and ecological community data presented in NatureServe Explorer at http://explorer.natureserve.org
were updated to be current with NatureServe's central databases as of November 2016.
Note: This report was printed on
Trademark Notice: "NatureServe", NatureServe Explorer, The NatureServe logo, and
all other names of NatureServe programs referenced herein are trademarks of NatureServe. Any other product or company
names mentioned herein are the trademarks of their respective owners.
Copyright © 2017 NatureServe, 4600 N. Fairfax Dr., 7th Floor, Arlington Virginia 22203, U.S.A. All Rights Reserved.
Each document delivered from this server or web site may contain other proprietary
notices and copyright information relating to that document. The following
citation should be used in any published materials which reference the
on Use: Permission to use, copy and distribute documents delivered from
this server is hereby granted under the following conditions:
Citation for data on website including State Distribution, Watershed, and Reptile Range maps:
NatureServe. 2017. NatureServe Explorer: An online encyclopedia of life [web application]. Version 7.1. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia.
Available http://explorer.natureserve.org. (Accessed:
Citation for Bird Range Maps of North America:
Ridgely, R.S., T.F. Allnutt, T. Brooks, D.K. McNicol, D.W. Mehlman, B.E. Young, and J.R. Zook. 2003. Digital Distribution Maps of the Birds of the Western Hemisphere, version 1.0. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia, USA.
Acknowledgement Statement for Bird Range Maps of North America:
"Data provided by NatureServe in collaboration with Robert Ridgely, James Zook, The Nature Conservancy - Migratory Bird Program, Conservation International - CABS, World Wildlife Fund - US, and Environment Canada - WILDSPACE."
Citation for Mammal Range Maps of North America:
Patterson, B.D., G. Ceballos, W. Sechrest, M.F. Tognelli, T. Brooks, L. Luna, P. Ortega, I. Salazar, and B.E. Young. 2003. Digital Distribution Maps of the Mammals of the Western Hemisphere, version 1.0. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia, USA.
Acknowledgement Statement for Mammal Range Maps of North America:
"Data provided by NatureServe in collaboration with Bruce Patterson, Wes Sechrest, Marcelo Tognelli, Gerardo Ceballos, The Nature Conservancy-Migratory Bird Program, Conservation International-CABS, World Wildlife Fund-US, and Environment Canada-WILDSPACE."
Citation for Amphibian Range Maps of the Western Hemisphere:
IUCN, Conservation International, and NatureServe. 2004. Global Amphibian Assessment. IUCN, Conservation International, and NatureServe, Washington, DC and Arlington, Virginia, USA.
Acknowledgement Statement for Amphibian Range Maps of the Western Hemisphere:
"Data developed as part of the Global Amphibian Assessment and provided by IUCN-World Conservation Union, Conservation International and NatureServe."
NOTE: Full metadata
for the Bird Range Maps of North America is available at:
Full metadata for the Mammal Range Maps of North America is available at:
Warranty Disclaimer: All
documents and related graphics provided by this server and any other documents
which are referenced by or linked to this server are provided "as is" without
warranty as to the currentness, completeness, or accuracy of any specific
data. NatureServe hereby disclaims all warranties and conditions with regard
to any documents provided by this server or any other documents which are
referenced by or linked to this server, including but not limited to all
implied warranties and conditions of merchantibility, fitness for a particular
purpose, and non-infringement. NatureServe makes no representations about
the suitability of the information delivered from this server or any other
documents that are referenced to or linked to this server. In no event shall
NatureServe be liable for any special, indirect, incidental, consequential
damages, or for damages of any kind arising out of or in connection with
the use or performance of information contained in any documents provided
by this server or in any other documents which are referenced by or linked
to this server, under any theory of liability used. NatureServe may update
or make changes to the documents provided by this server at any time without
notice; however, NatureServe makes no commitment to update the information
contained herein. Since the data in the central databases are continually
being updated, it is advisable to refresh data retrieved at least once a
year after its receipt. The data provided is for planning, assessment, and
informational purposes. Site specific projects or activities should be reviewed
for potential environmental impacts with appropriate regulatory agencies.
If ground-disturbing activities are proposed on a site, the appropriate
state natural heritage program(s) or conservation data center can be contacted
for a site-specific review of the project area (see Visit
- The above copyright notice
must appear in all copies;
- Any use of the documents available
from this server must be for informational purposes only and in no instance
for commercial purposes;
- Some data may be downloaded
to files and altered in format for analytical purposes, however the data
should still be referenced using the citation above;
- No graphics available from
this server can be used, copied or distributed separate from the accompanying
text. Any rights not expressly granted herein are reserved by NatureServe. Nothing contained herein shall be construed
as conferring by implication, estoppel, or otherwise any license or right
under any trademark of NatureServe. No
trademark owned by NatureServe may be used
in advertising or promotion pertaining to the distribution of documents
delivered from this server without specific advance permission from NatureServe. Except as expressly provided above,
nothing contained herein shall be construed as conferring any license or
right under any NatureServe copyright.
encourages users to let us know of any errors or significant omissions
that you find in the data through (see Contact
Us). Your comments will be very valuable in improving the overall
quality of our databases for the benefit of all users.