- (Linnaeus, 1766)
Other English Common Names: Eastern Ribbon Snake, eastern ribbonsnake
Taxonomic Status: Accepted
Related ITIS Name(s):
Thamnophis sauritus (Linnaeus, 1766) (TSN 174134)
French Common Names: couleuvre mince
Unique Identifier: ELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.103516
Element Code: ARADB36120
Informal Taxonomy: Animals, Vertebrates
Genus Size: D - Medium to large genus (21+ species)
Check this box to expand all report sections:
Concept Reference: Collins, J. T. 1990. Standard common and current scientific names for North American amphibians and reptiles. 3rd ed. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles. Herpetological Circular No. 19. 41 pp.
Concept Reference Code: B90COL01NAUS
Name Used in Concept Reference: Thamnophis sauritus
Taxonomic Comments: Referred to as T. sirtalis by some authors in late 1940s and early 1950s.
Global Status: G5
Global Status Last Reviewed: 07Sep2006
Global Status Last Changed: 26Feb1997
Rounded Global Status: G5 - Secure
Nation: United States
National Status: N5
National Status: N3
U.S. & Canada State/Province Status
Alabama (S5), Connecticut (S3S4), Delaware (S2), District of Columbia (S4), Florida (S5), Georgia (S5), Illinois (S1), Indiana (SNR), Kentucky (S3), Louisiana (S4), Maine (S3), Maryland (S5), Massachusetts (S4S5), Michigan (S5), Mississippi (S5), New Hampshire (S5), New Jersey (S5), New York (S4), North Carolina (S4), Ohio (SNR), Pennsylvania (S3), Rhode Island (S3), South Carolina (SNR), Tennessee (S4S5), Vermont (S2), Virginia (S5), West Virginia (S2), Wisconsin (S1)
Nova Scotia (S2S3), Ontario (S3), Quebec (S1)
Implied Status under the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC):PS: T,SC
Comments on COSEWIC: In November 2012, COSEWIC designated the Great Lakes population as Special Concern and the Atlantic population as Threatened.
IUCN Red List Category: LC - Least concern
NatureServe Global Conservation Status Factors
Range Extent: 200,000-2,500,000 square km (about 80,000-1,000,000 square miles)
Range Extent Comments: The range extends from Wisconsin to southern Maine and Nova Scotia, and south discontinuously to southeastern Louisiana, the Gulf Coast, and southern Florida (Conant and Collins 1991, Rossman et al. 1996, Ernst and Ernst 2003). This species has been reported from the Bahamas but may not be established there (see Powell and Henderson 1999).
Number of Occurrences: 81 to >300
Number of Occurrences Comments: This species is represented by a large number of occurrences (subpopulations).
Population Size: 100,000 to >1,000,000 individuals
Population Size Comments: Adult population size is unknown but presumably exceeds 100,000. This snake is locally common in many parts of its large range.
Number of Occurrences with Good Viability/Integrity: Many to very many (41 to >125)
Overall Threat Impact: Medium
Overall Threat Impact Comments: In most areas, this snake is not significantly threatened. Ernst and Ernst (2003) stated that populations are declining over much of the range because of habitat destruction, but this likely pertains primarily to peripheral populations or areas where the species is naturally rare. Degradation of shoreline vegetation is believed to result in population declines (Harding 1997). Locally, large numbers are killed on roads (Rossman et al. 1996), but this may be more a reflection of local abundance than a significant threat.
Short-term Trend: Relatively Stable (<=10% change)
Short-term Trend Comments: Populations may be declining in some areas (Ernst and Ernst 2003), but overall the extent of occurrence, area of occupancy, number of subpopulations, and population size probably are relatively stable or declining at a rate of less than 10 percent over 10 years or three generations.
Long-term Trend: Decline of <30% to increase of 25%
Other NatureServe Conservation Status Information
(200,000-2,500,000 square km (about 80,000-1,000,000 square miles))
The range extends from Wisconsin to southern Maine and Nova Scotia, and south discontinuously to southeastern Louisiana, the Gulf Coast, and southern Florida (Conant and Collins 1991, Rossman et al. 1996, Ernst and Ernst 2003). This species has been reported from the Bahamas but may not be established there (see Powell and Henderson 1999).
U.S. States and Canadian Provinces
Endemism: occurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations
U.S. & Canada State/Province Distribution
AL, CT, DC, DE, FL, GA, IL, IN, KY, LA, MA, MD, ME, MI, MS, NC, NH, NJ, NY, OH, PA, RI, SC, TN, VA, VT, WI, WV
NS, ON, QC
Note: Range depicted for New World only. The scale of the maps may cause narrow coastal ranges or ranges on small islands not to appear. Not all vagrant or small disjunct occurrences are depicted. For migratory birds, some individuals occur outside of the passage migrant range depicted.
Range Map Compilers: NatureServe, 2005
U.S. Distribution by County
||County Name (FIPS Code)
New Haven (09009),
New London (09011),
New Castle (10003),
* Extirpated/possibly extirpated
U.S. Distribution by Watershed
||Watershed Name (Watershed Code)
Lower Kennebec (01030003)+,
Maine Coastal (01050002)+,
Piscataqua-Salmon Falls (01060003)+,
Lower Connecticut (01080205)+,
Middle Delaware-Mongaup-Brodhead (02040104)+,
Middle Delaware-Musconetcong (02040105)+,
Upper Susquehanna (02050101)+,
Upper Susquehanna-Lackawanna (02050107)+,
Lower West Branch Susquehanna (02050206)+,
Lower Susquehanna-Penns (02050301)+,
Upper Juniata (02050302)+,
Lower Susquehanna-Swatara (02050305)+,
Lower Susquehanna (02050306)+,
Pokomoke-Western Lower Delmarva (02080111)+
Florida Bay-Florida Keys (03090203)+
Upper Fox (04030201)+*,
Mettawee River (04150401)+,
Winooski River (04150403)+*,
Lake Champlain (04150408)+
Tygart Valley (05020001)+,
Middle New (05050002)+*,
Upper Green (05110001)+,
Middle Green (05110003)+,
Lower Green (05110005)+,
Lower Wabash (05120113)+,
Little Wabash (05120114)+,
Lower Cumberland (05130205)+,
Lower Ohio-Little Pigeon (05140201)+,
Lower Ohio-Bay (05140203)+*,
Lower Ohio (05140206)+
Lower Tennessee (06040006)+
Castle Rock (07070003)+*,
Bayou De Chien-Mayfield (08010201)+,
+ Natural heritage record(s) exist for this watershed
* Extirpated/possibly extirpated
Ecology & Life History
Reproduction Comments: Gives birth to 3-26 (average about 9) young in July or August; captives have produced 2 litters in a season; sexually mature in 2-3 years in Michigan (Fitch 1970).
Ecology Comments: Home range averaged 0.8 ha in Michigan study (see DeGraaf and Rudis 1983).
Locally Migrant: Y
Long Distance Migrant: N
Mobility and Migration Comments: May migrate between aquatic edge habitat and hibernaculum on higher ground (Minton 1972).
Riverine Habitat(s): CREEK, Low gradient, Pool
Lacustrine Habitat(s): Shallow water
Palustrine Habitat(s): Bog/fen, FORESTED WETLAND, HERBACEOUS WETLAND, Riparian, SCRUB-SHRUB WETLAND
Terrestrial Habitat(s): Bare rock/talus/scree
Special Habitat Factors: Burrowing in or using soil, Fallen log/debris
Habitat Comments: Habitats include wet meadows, marshes, seasonally flooded prairies, bogs, ponds, lake shorelines, swamps, and shallow slow streams; also hardwood hammocks and other wet or moist forest in some areas; usually this snake is in or near vegetative cover (often shrubs or clumps of sedges or grasses) in sun-exposed sites along the edge of standing or flowing water; it climbs into low vegetation, rarely into tree canopy (Bishop and Farrell, 1994, Herpetol. Rev. 25:127; Rossman et al. 1996, Harding 1997, Ernst and Ernst 2003). Shelters include thick vegetation, muskrat lodges, or burrows. Hibernation sites are in burrows, ant mounds, underground on high ground (sometimes high on rocky slopes), or underwater.
Adult Food Habits: Carnivore, Piscivore
Immature Food Habits: Carnivore, Piscivore
Food Comments: Primary diet includes amphibians and fishes. Most prey is obtained in water or on the ground near water, sometimes in vegetation.
Adult Phenology: Circadian, Diurnal, Hibernates/aestivates
Immature Phenology: Circadian, Diurnal, Hibernates/aestivates
Phenology Comments: Active diurnally April-October in north; active season longer in south, where activity may occur day or night.
Length: 102 centimeters
Not yet assessed
Not yet assessed
Group Name: Medium And Large Colubrid Snakes
Use Class: Not applicable
Minimum Criteria for an Occurrence: Occurrences are based on evidence of historical presence, or current and likely recurring presence, at a given location. Such evidence minimally includes collection or reliable observation and documentation of one or more individuals (including eggs) in or near appropriate habitat where the species is presumed to be established and breeding.
Separation Barriers: Busy highway or highway with obstructions such that snakes rarely if ever cross successfully; major river, lake, pond, or deep marsh (this barrier pertains only to upland species and does not apply to aquatic or wetland snakes); densely urbanized area dominated by buildings and pavement.
Separation Distance for Unsuitable Habitat: 1 km
Separation Distance for Suitable Habitat: 10 km
Separation Justification: Available information on movements of colubrid snakes is limited to a small minority of species. These data indicate that nearly all species have home ranges smaller or much smaller than 25 ha (e.g., less than 3 ha, Pituophis catenifer in California, Rodriguez-Robles 2003), with some up to about 75 ha (Heterodon platirhinos, average 50 ha, Plummer and Mills 2000), and the largest up to 225 ha in the biggest colubrids (Drymarchon, summer mean 50-100 ha, USFWS 1998).
Radiotelemetry data for Pantherophis indicate that residents of hibernacula that are 1-2 km apart (with suitable intervening habitat) probably interbreed (Prior et al. 1997, Blouin-Demers and Weatherhead 2002). However, "evidence of genetic structure even over short distances (e.g., 2-20 km) implies that gene flow among rat snake populations can be easily disrupted" (Prior et al. 1997). Loughheed et al. (1999) found evidence of substantial genetic exchange among local hibernacula (< 6 km apart), but gene flow over distances of 10s of km appears to be substantially less. Based on extensive radio-tracking data, Blouin-Demers and Weatherhead (2002) found that home range size of Pantherophis averaged 18.5 ha and ranged up to 93 ha; based on the most mobile individuals, Pantherophis from hibernacula up to 8 km apart can come together for mating. Pantherophis and probably other colubrids exhibit high fidelity to hibernacula and shift even to nearby sites only rarely (Prior et al. 2001).
Many of the several studies that report small home ranges for colubrids did not employ methods (e.g., radio telemetry) suitable for detecting full annual or multi-annual home range size, dispersal, or other long-distance movements, so these may have yielded underestimates of home ranges or activity areas.
At least some colubrids, including medium-sized species such as garter snakes, not uncommonly move between areas up to a few kilometers apart, and several species make extensive movements of up to several kilometers, so separation distances of 1-2 km for suitable habitat are too small for medium-sized and large colubrids.
A separation distance of 10 km for suitable habitat was selected as most appropriate for snakes assigned to this Specs Group because it seems generally unlikely that two locations separated by less than 10 km of suitable habitat would represent distinct occurrences.
For the purposes of these occurrence specifications, upland habitat is regarded as unsuitable habitat for aquatic and wetland snakes. For upland snakes, shallow or patchy wetlands are treated as unsuitable habitat whereas large deepwater habitats (subjective determination) are barriers.
Inferred Minimum Extent of Habitat Use (when actual extent is unknown): .5 km
Author: Hammerson, G.
Notes: Separation distance for suitable habitat was changed from 5 km to 10 km based on comments from Dale Jackson (12 Feb 2013).
U.S. Invasive Species Impact Rank (I-Rank)
Not yet assessed
NatureServe Conservation Status Factors Edition Date: 07Sep2006
NatureServe Conservation Status Factors Author: Hammerson, G.
Element Ecology & Life History Edition Date: 07Sep2006
Element Ecology & Life History Author(s): Hammerson, G.
Zoological data developed by NatureServe and its network of
natural heritage programs (see Local Programs) and other contributors and cooperators (see Sources).
- Behler, J. L., and F. W. King. 1979. The Audubon Society field guide to North American reptiles and amphibians. Alfred A. Knopf, New York. 719 pp.
- Bell, Sarah L.M., Tom B. Herman, Richard J. Wassersug. 2007. Ecology of Thamnophis sauritus (Eastern Ribbon Snake) at the northern limit of its range. Northeastern Naturalist 14(2): 279-292.
- Bider, R. J. et S. Matte. 1994. Atlas des amphibiens et des reptiles du Québec. Société d'histoire naturelle de la vallée du Saint-Laurent, Ministère de l'Environnement et de la Faune, Direction de la faune et des habitats. 106 p.
- COSEWIC 2002. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the eastern ribbonsnake Thamnophis sauritus. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. vi + 24 pp.
- Collins, J. T. 1990. Standard common and current scientific names for North American amphibians and reptiles. 3rd ed. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles. Herpetological Circular No. 19. 41 pp.
- Conant, R. and J. T. Collins. 1991. A field guide to reptiles and amphibians: eastern and central North America. Third edition. Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston, Massachusetts. 450 pp.
- Conant, R., and J. T. Collins. 1998. A field guide to reptiles and amphibians: eastern and central North America. Third edition, expanded. Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston, Massachusetts. 616 pp.
- Cook, F. R. 1984. Introduction to Canadian amphibians and reptiles. National Museum of Natural Sciences, National Museums of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario.
- Cook, F.R. 1984. Introduction aux Amphibiens et Reptiles du Canada. Musée national des sciences naturelles. 211 p.
- Crother, B. I. (editor). 2008. Scientific and standard English names of amphibians and reptiles of North America north of Mexico, with comments regarding confidence in our understanding. Sixth edition. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles Herpetological Circular 37:1-84.
- Crother, B. I. (editor). 2008. Scientific and standard English names of amphibians and reptiles of North America north of Mexico, with comments regarding confidence in our understanding. Sixth edition. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles Herpetological Circular 37:1-84. Online with updates at: http://www.ssarherps.org/pages/comm_names/Index.php
- Crother, B. I. (editor). 2012. Scientific and standard English names of amphibians and reptiles of North America north of Mexico, with comments regarding confidence in our understanding. 7th edition. SSAR Herpetological Circular 39:1-92.
- DeGraaf, R. M., and D. D. Rudis. 1983. Amphibians and reptiles of New England. Habitats and natural history. Univ. Massachusetts Press. vii + 83 pp.
- Desroches, J.-F. et D. Rodrigue 2004. Amphibiens et reptiles du Québec et des Maritimes. Éditions Michel Quintin. 288 pages.
- Ernst, C. H., and E. M. Ernst. 2003. Snakes of the United States and Canada. Smithsonian Books, Washington, D.C.
- Fitch, H. S. 1970. Reproductive cycles of lizards and snakes. Univ. Kansas Museum Natural History Miscellaneous Publication 52:1-247.
- Gilhen, J. 1984. Amphibians and reptiles of Nova Scotia. Nova Scotia Museum, Halifax, Nova Scotia. 162 pp.
- Hammerson, G. 2001. EO Specs for Medium and Large Colubrid Snakes (ELCODE ARADB00002). NatureServe, unpublished. 2 pp.
- Harding, J. H. 1997. Amphibians and reptiles of the Great Lakes region. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor. xvi + 378 pp.
- Lawson, R. 1987. Molecular studies of thamnophiine snakes: 1. The phylogeny of the genus NERODIA. J. Herpetology 21:140-157.
- Logier, E. B. S. 1958. The snakes of Ontario. University of Toronto Press, Canada. Pp. 56-69.
- Minton, S. A., Jr. 1972. Amphibians and reptiles of Indiana. Indiana Academy Science Monographs 3. v + 346 pp.
- Mirarchi, R.E., editor. 2004. Alabama Wildlife. Volume 1. A checklist of vertebrates and selected invertebrates: aquatic mollusks, fishes, amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals. The University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, Alabama. 209 pages.
- Mount, R. H. 1975. The reptiles and amphibians of Alabama. Auburn University Agricultural Experiment Station, Auburn, Alabama. vii + 347 pages.
- Oldham, M.J. and K. Ramster. 2002. COSSARO Candidate Species at Risk Evaluation Form for Northern Ribbon Snake (Thamnophis sauritus septentrionalis). Committee on the Status of Species at Risk in Ontario (COSSARO), Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Peterborough, Ontario. Unpublished report. 11 pp. + 3 appendices.
- Powell, R., and R. W. Henderson. 1999. Addenda to the checklist of West Indian amphibians and reptiles. Herpetological Review 30:137-139.
- Rossman, D. A. 1970. Thamnophis sauritus. Catalogue of American Amphibians and Reptiles 99.1-99.2.
- Rossman, D. A., N. B. Ford, and R. A. Seigel. 1996. The garter snakes: evolution and ecology. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman. xx + 332 pp.
- Rossman, D.A. 1963. The Colubrid Snake Genus Thamnophis: A Revision of the Sauritus Group. Bulletin of the Florida State Museum, Biological Sciences 7(3): 99-178.
- Smith, K. 1999. Status Report on the Northern Ribbon Snake, Thamnophis sauritus septentrionalis, in Canada. DRAFT (February 1999). Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC), Ottawa, Ontario. 25 pp.
- Smith, Kim. 1999. Draft COSEWIC Status Report on Northern Ribbon Snake (Thamnophis sauritus septentrionalis). Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC); (unpublished). 27 pp.
- Tobias, T.N. and R.R. Evans. 1979. Range extension of the Ribbon Snake in Ontario. Trail & Landscape 13(5): 180-181.
- Vogt, R. C. 1981. Natural history of amphibians and reptiles of Wisconsin. Milwaukee Public Museum. 205 pp.
- Weller, W.F., M.J. Oldham, D. Seburn and C. Seburn. 1995. Atlas of Ontario Amphibians and Reptiles Draft Species Account, Northern Ribbon Snake - Couleuvre mince, Thamnophis sauritus septentrionalis. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Ontario Field Herpetologists, Natural Heritage Information Centre. 7 pp. [draft, March 1995]
- Woods, J.G. and F.R. Cook. 1976. Range extension of the Ribbon snake in eastern Ontario. Canadian Field-Naturalist 90(1): 69-70.
Use Guidelines & Citation
Use Guidelines and Citation
The Small Print: Trademark, Copyright, Citation Guidelines, Restrictions on Use, and Information Disclaimer.
Note: All species and ecological community data presented in NatureServe Explorer at http://explorer.natureserve.org
were updated to be current with NatureServe's central databases as of October 2015.
Note: This report was printed on
Trademark Notice: "NatureServe", NatureServe Explorer, The NatureServe logo, and
all other names of NatureServe programs referenced herein are trademarks of NatureServe. Any other product or company
names mentioned herein are the trademarks of their respective owners.
Copyright © 2015 NatureServe, 4600 N. Fairfax Dr., 7th Floor, Arlington Virginia 22203, U.S.A. All Rights Reserved.
Each document delivered from this server or web site may contain other proprietary
notices and copyright information relating to that document. The following
citation should be used in any published materials which reference the
on Use: Permission to use, copy and distribute documents delivered from
this server is hereby granted under the following conditions:
Citation for data on website including State Distribution, Watershed, and Reptile Range maps:
NatureServe. 2015. NatureServe Explorer: An online encyclopedia of life [web application]. Version 7.1. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia.
Available http://explorer.natureserve.org. (Accessed:
Citation for Bird Range Maps of North America:
Ridgely, R.S., T.F. Allnutt, T. Brooks, D.K. McNicol, D.W. Mehlman, B.E. Young, and J.R. Zook. 2003. Digital Distribution Maps of the Birds of the Western Hemisphere, version 1.0. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia, USA.
Acknowledgement Statement for Bird Range Maps of North America:
"Data provided by NatureServe in collaboration with Robert Ridgely, James Zook, The Nature Conservancy - Migratory Bird Program, Conservation International - CABS, World Wildlife Fund - US, and Environment Canada - WILDSPACE."
Citation for Mammal Range Maps of North America:
Patterson, B.D., G. Ceballos, W. Sechrest, M.F. Tognelli, T. Brooks, L. Luna, P. Ortega, I. Salazar, and B.E. Young. 2003. Digital Distribution Maps of the Mammals of the Western Hemisphere, version 1.0. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia, USA.
Acknowledgement Statement for Mammal Range Maps of North America:
"Data provided by NatureServe in collaboration with Bruce Patterson, Wes Sechrest, Marcelo Tognelli, Gerardo Ceballos, The Nature Conservancy-Migratory Bird Program, Conservation International-CABS, World Wildlife Fund-US, and Environment Canada-WILDSPACE."
Citation for Amphibian Range Maps of the Western Hemisphere:
IUCN, Conservation International, and NatureServe. 2004. Global Amphibian Assessment. IUCN, Conservation International, and NatureServe, Washington, DC and Arlington, Virginia, USA.
Acknowledgement Statement for Amphibian Range Maps of the Western Hemisphere:
"Data developed as part of the Global Amphibian Assessment and provided by IUCN-World Conservation Union, Conservation International and NatureServe."
NOTE: Full metadata
for the Bird Range Maps of North America is available at:
Full metadata for the Mammal Range Maps of North America is available at:
Warranty Disclaimer: All
documents and related graphics provided by this server and any other documents
which are referenced by or linked to this server are provided "as is" without
warranty as to the currentness, completeness, or accuracy of any specific
data. NatureServe hereby disclaims all warranties and conditions with regard
to any documents provided by this server or any other documents which are
referenced by or linked to this server, including but not limited to all
implied warranties and conditions of merchantibility, fitness for a particular
purpose, and non-infringement. NatureServe makes no representations about
the suitability of the information delivered from this server or any other
documents that are referenced to or linked to this server. In no event shall
NatureServe be liable for any special, indirect, incidental, consequential
damages, or for damages of any kind arising out of or in connection with
the use or performance of information contained in any documents provided
by this server or in any other documents which are referenced by or linked
to this server, under any theory of liability used. NatureServe may update
or make changes to the documents provided by this server at any time without
notice; however, NatureServe makes no commitment to update the information
contained herein. Since the data in the central databases are continually
being updated, it is advisable to refresh data retrieved at least once a
year after its receipt. The data provided is for planning, assessment, and
informational purposes. Site specific projects or activities should be reviewed
for potential environmental impacts with appropriate regulatory agencies.
If ground-disturbing activities are proposed on a site, the appropriate
state natural heritage program(s) or conservation data center can be contacted
for a site-specific review of the project area (see Visit
- The above copyright notice
must appear in all copies;
- Any use of the documents available
from this server must be for informational purposes only and in no instance
for commercial purposes;
- Some data may be downloaded
to files and altered in format for analytical purposes, however the data
should still be referenced using the citation above;
- No graphics available from
this server can be used, copied or distributed separate from the accompanying
text. Any rights not expressly granted herein are reserved by NatureServe. Nothing contained herein shall be construed
as conferring by implication, estoppel, or otherwise any license or right
under any trademark of NatureServe. No
trademark owned by NatureServe may be used
in advertising or promotion pertaining to the distribution of documents
delivered from this server without specific advance permission from NatureServe. Except as expressly provided above,
nothing contained herein shall be construed as conferring any license or
right under any NatureServe copyright.
encourages users to let us know of any errors or significant omissions
that you find in the data through (see Contact
Us). Your comments will be very valuable in improving the overall
quality of our databases for the benefit of all users.