Regina septemvittata - (Say, 1825)
Queen Snake
Other English Common Names: Queensnake
Synonym(s): Natrix septemvittata
Taxonomic Status: Accepted
Related ITIS Name(s): Regina septemvittata (Say, 1825) (TSN 174125)
French Common Names: couleuvre royale
Unique Identifier: ELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.102448
Element Code: ARADB27040
Informal Taxonomy: Animals, Vertebrates - Reptiles - Snakes
 
Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family Genus
Animalia Craniata Reptilia Squamata Colubridae Regina
Genus Size: B - Very small genus (2-5 species)
Check this box to expand all report sections:
Concept Reference
Help
Concept Reference: Collins, J. T. 1990. Standard common and current scientific names for North American amphibians and reptiles. 3rd ed. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles. Herpetological Circular No. 19. 41 pp.
Concept Reference Code: B90COL01NAUS
Name Used in Concept Reference: Regina septemvittata
Taxonomic Comments: Molecular data indicate that Regina is polyphyletic; a taxonomic revision is warranted (Alfaro and Arnold 2001). See Ernst et al. (2002) for a discussion of the taxonomy of Regina.
Conservation Status
Help

NatureServe Status

Global Status: G5
Global Status Last Reviewed: 02Feb2016
Global Status Last Changed: 30Oct1996
Ranking Methodology Used: Ranked by inspection
Rounded Global Status: G5 - Secure
Nation: United States
National Status: N5 (05Oct1996)
Nation: Canada
National Status: N2 (02Feb2016)

U.S. & Canada State/Province Status
United States Alabama (S5), Arkansas (S2), Delaware (S1), District of Columbia (S1), Florida (SNR), Georgia (S5), Illinois (S4), Indiana (S4), Kentucky (S4), Maryland (S5), Michigan (S4), Mississippi (S3), Missouri (SX), New Jersey (S1), New York (S1), North Carolina (S4), Ohio (SNR), Pennsylvania (S3), South Carolina (SNR), Tennessee (S5), Virginia (S5), West Virginia (S4), Wisconsin (S1)
Canada Ontario (S2)

Other Statuses

Canadian Species at Risk Act (SARA) Schedule 1/Annexe 1 Status: E (05Jun2003)
Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC): Endangered (25Apr2010)
Comments on COSEWIC: Designated Threatened in April 1999. Status re-examined and confirmed in May 2000. Status re-examined and designated Endangered in April 2010.

This species has a restricted and shrinking distribution in southwest Ontario. It consists of scattered small populations which are isolated due to habitat fragmentation and the species limited dispersal capacity. Over the last decade, the number of extant locations has declined and the species riparian and riverine habitat has continued to be lost and degraded. The species is limited by its extremely specialized diet and threatened by decline in its prey of freshly moulted juvenile crayfish. Other threats include persecution and effects of invasive Zebra Mussels and Common Reed.

IUCN Red List Category: LC - Least concern

NatureServe Global Conservation Status Factors

Range Extent: 200,000-2,500,000 square km (about 80,000-1,000,000 square miles)
Range Extent Comments: The range extends from the southern Great Lakes region (southeastern Wisconsin, Michigan, southern Ontario, and western New York) to the Gulf Coast of the Florida panhandle, and east to southeastern Pennsylvania, western New Jersey, and northern Delmarva Peninsula, and west disjunctly to Missouri (extirpated, Johnson 2000) and Arkansas (Barbour 1971, Mount 1975, Mitchell 1994, Palmer and Braswell 1995, Harding 1997, Phillips et al. 1999, Hulse et al. 2001, Ernst 2002, White and White 2002, Ernst and Ernst 2003, Gibbons and Dorcas 2004, Trauth et al. 2004).

Number of Occurrences: 81 to >300
Number of Occurrences Comments: This species is represetned by a large number of occurrences (subpopulations) (see county distribution map in Gibbons and Dorcas 2004). Palmer and Braswell (1995) mapped over 100 collection sites in North Carolina alone.

Population Size: 100,000 - 1,000,000 individuals
Population Size Comments: Adult population size is unknown but presumably exceeds 100,000. This snake is common in many areas with suitable habitat. It is common along many streams above the Fall Line in Alabama (Mount 1975); uncommon in most of the range in Illinois, but locally abundant in good habitat (Phillips et al. 1999); uncommon and local in most of the range in the Great Lakes region, but locally common where ideal habitat remains (Harding 1997).

Overall Threat Impact: Medium
Overall Threat Impact Comments: Threats and declines appear to be greatest in the northern or peripheral parts of the range where habitat alteration has negatively affected crayfish populations (Gibbons and Dorcas 2004). Ernst and Ernst (2003) stated that water pollution and acid rain have combined to reduce crayfish populations in many parts of the eastern portion of the snake's range, and that this, along with drainage of wetlands, has eliminated the queen snake from many areas where it was once common. In Arkansas, eutrophication due to livestock or poultry waste runoff into streams is a possible threat, as is "overuse of water resources by human recreational activities" (Trauth et al. 2004). In the Great Lakes region, siltation from urban or agricultural runoff may reduce or eliminate crayfish populations (Harding 1997). Threats in Illinois include pollution that reduces crayfish populations and siltation of rocky stream bottoms (Phillips et al. 1999). Anecdotal evidence suggests that local populations in the northeastern United States are being reduced in numbers or extirpated as a result of adverse effects of stream degradation and pollution on crayfish (Mitchell 1994, Hulse et al. 2001, White and White 2002). Other potential threats include stream channelization and large impoundments (Mitchell 1994).

Short-term Trend: Relatively Stable (<=10% change)
Short-term Trend Comments: Currently, extent of occurrence, area of occupnacy, number of subpopulations, and population size probably are relatively stable or declining at a rate of less than 10 percent over 10 years or three generations.

Long-term Trend: Decline of <50% to Relatively Stable
Long-term Trend Comments: Area of occupancy, number of subpopulations, and population size appear to have declined in some parts of the range (Ernst and Ernst 2003), but the degree of decline is unknown. In the Great Lakes region, numbers have declined in many places due largely to habitat degradation; this species is now scarce or absent in many stream that once harbored healthy populations (Harding 1997). This species appears to be declining on the Delmarva Peninsula (White and White 2002).

Other NatureServe Conservation Status Information

Distribution
Help
Global Range: (200,000-2,500,000 square km (about 80,000-1,000,000 square miles)) The range extends from the southern Great Lakes region (southeastern Wisconsin, Michigan, southern Ontario, and western New York) to the Gulf Coast of the Florida panhandle, and east to southeastern Pennsylvania, western New Jersey, and northern Delmarva Peninsula, and west disjunctly to Missouri (extirpated, Johnson 2000) and Arkansas (Barbour 1971, Mount 1975, Mitchell 1994, Palmer and Braswell 1995, Harding 1997, Phillips et al. 1999, Hulse et al. 2001, Ernst 2002, White and White 2002, Ernst and Ernst 2003, Gibbons and Dorcas 2004, Trauth et al. 2004).

U.S. States and Canadian Provinces
Color legend for Distribution Map
Endemism: occurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations

U.S. & Canada State/Province Distribution
United States AL, AR, DC, DE, FL, GA, IL, IN, KY, MD, MI, MOextirpated, MS, NC, NJ, NY, OH, PA, SC, TN, VA, WI, WV
Canada ON

Range Map
Note: Range depicted for New World only. The scale of the maps may cause narrow coastal ranges or ranges on small islands not to appear. Not all vagrant or small disjunct occurrences are depicted. For migratory birds, some individuals occur outside of the passage migrant range depicted.

Range Map Compilers: NatureServe, 2005


U.S. Distribution by County Help
State County Name (FIPS Code)
AR Crawford (05033), Faulkner (05045), Franklin (05047), Independence (05063), Johnson (05071), Pope (05115)*, Van Buren (05141)*
DE New Castle (10003)
MS Covington (28031)*, Jefferson Davis (28065)*, Lauderdale (28075), Newton (28101), Simpson (28127)*, Smith (28129)*, Tishomingo (28141), Wayne (28153)*
NY Erie (36029), Genesee (36037), Livingston (36051)*, Monroe (36055), Ontario (36069)*, Wyoming (36121)*
PA Allegheny (42003), Armstrong (42005), Berks (42011), Butler (42019), Chester (42029), Clarion (42031), Cumberland (42041), Erie (42049), Fayette (42051), Franklin (42055), Indiana (42063), Lancaster (42071), Lebanon (42075), Schuylkill (42107), Venango (42121), Washington (42125), Westmoreland (42129), York (42133)
WI Dane (55025)*, Green (55045), Jefferson (55055)*, Ozaukee (55089)*, Racine (55101)*, Rock (55105), Walworth (55127), Washington (55131), Waukesha (55133)
* Extirpated/possibly extirpated
U.S. Distribution by Watershed Help
Watershed Region Help Watershed Name (Watershed Code)
02 Schuylkill (02040203)+, Brandywine-Christina (02040205)+, Upper West Branch Susquehanna (02050201)+, Lower Susquehanna-Swatara (02050305)+, Lower Susquehanna (02050306)+, Conococheague-Opequon (02070004)+
03 Chunky-Okatibbee (03170001)+, Upper Chickasawhay (03170002)+*, Upper Leaf (03170004)+*, Middle Pearl-Strong (03180002)+*, Middle Pearl-Silver (03180003)+*
04 Pike-Root (04040002)+*, Milwaukee (04040003)+*, Chautauqua-Conneaut (04120101)+, Buffalo-Eighteenmile (04120103)+, Upper Genesee (04130002)+*, Lower Genesee (04130003)+
05 Middle Allegheny-Tionesta (05010003)+, Middle Allegheny-Redbank (05010006)+, Conemaugh (05010007)+, Lower Allegheny (05010009)+, Lower Monongahela (05020005)+, Youghiogheny (05020006)+, Upper Ohio (05030101)+, Connoquenessing (05030105)+
06 Pickwick Lake (06030005)+*, Bear (06030006)+
07 Upper Rock (07090001)+, Crawfish (07090002)+, Sugar (07090004)+
11 Middle White (11010004)+, Upper White-Village (11010013)+, Little Red (11010014)+*, Frog-Mulberry (11110201)+, Dardanelle Reservoir (11110202)+*, Lake Conway-Point Remove (11110203)+*, Cadron (11110205)+
+ Natural heritage record(s) exist for this watershed
* Extirpated/possibly extirpated
Ecology & Life History
Help
Reproduction Comments: Gives birth to 5-31 young, July-early September (Behler and King 1979, Ashton and Ashton 1981). Males sexually mature in 2 years, females in 3 years (Vogt 1981).
Non-Migrant: N
Locally Migrant: N
Long Distance Migrant: N
Riverine Habitat(s): CREEK, High gradient, MEDIUM RIVER, Moderate gradient
Palustrine Habitat(s): FORESTED WETLAND, Riparian, SCRUB-SHRUB WETLAND
Special Habitat Factors: Burrowing in or using soil, Fallen log/debris
Habitat Comments: This snake occurs only where crayfish are present and fairly abundant, generally in moderate to fast-flowing streams with ample cover, wooded or open conditions, and good exposure to sun. Habitat has been characterized as follows: streams with vegetation along the shoreline, and rocky (north) or sandy (south) bottoms (Gibbons and Dorcas 2004); clean streams or marshes of open areas or woodlands (Ernst and Ernst 2003); small clear creeks with rocky or dandy bottoms, stream impoundments (Alabama; Mount 1975); woodland streams and cypress domes (Florida; Tennant 1997); exposed rocky river shorelines (Arkansas; Trauth et al. 2004); shallow rocky streams in agricultural, urban, and forested areas (Virginia; Mitchell 1994); shallow streams and rivers with plenty of sun, rocks, and overhanging shrubs and small trees (North Carolina; Palmer and Braswell 1995); unpolluted rocky woodland streams (Illinois; Phillips et al. 1999); small rocky streams in wooded areas or open pastures, swampy woods (Kentucky; Barbour 1971); clear, spring-fed streams with moderate to fast currents and rocky bottoms, in lowland hardwood forests and shrub-carr communities (Wisconsin; Vogt 1981). In some areas the habitat may include slow-moving streams, ditches, canals, freshwater marshes, or the edges of ponds or lakes (Mitchell 1994, Harding 1997, Hulse et al. 2001, Gibbons and Dorcas 2004), but this species generally is uncommon or absent from these habitats (Palmer and Braswell 1995, Minton 2001). This snake basks on branches overhanging the water. Sometimes it travels on land away from water. Refuges include burrows, rocks, logs, and other cover.
Adult Food Habits: Invertivore
Immature Food Habits: Invertivore
Food Comments: Eats almost exclusively crayfish; occasionally also small fishes, amphibian larvae, or other small animals (Branson and Baker 1974; Lee et al., 2004, Herpetological Review 35:72).
Adult Phenology: Circadian, Diurnal, Hibernates/aestivates
Immature Phenology: Circadian, Diurnal, Hibernates/aestivates
Phenology Comments: Active May-September in north (Vogt 1981). Active day or night in south (Mount 1975), reportedly not active at night in Indiana (Minton 1972).
Length: 93 centimeters
Economic Attributes Not yet assessed
Help
Management Summary Not yet assessed
Help
Population/Occurrence Delineation
Help
Group Name: Small Colubrid Snakes

Use Class: Not applicable
Minimum Criteria for an Occurrence: Occurrences are based on evidence of historical presence, or current and likely recurring presence, at a given location. Such evidence minimally includes collection or reliable observation and documentation of one or more individuals (including eggs) in or near appropriate habitat where the species is presumed to be established and breeding.
Separation Barriers: Busy highway or highway with obstructions such that snakes rarely if ever cross successfully; major river, lake, pond, or deep marsh (this barrier does not apply to aquatic or wetland species); densely urbanized area dominated by buildings and pavement.
Separation Distance for Unsuitable Habitat: 1 km
Separation Distance for Suitable Habitat: 5 km
Separation Justification: Data are limited to only a few species, but small colubrid snakes such as Diadophis punctatus (Fitch 1975) and Carphophis amoenus (Barbour et al. 1969, Clark 1970) generally have relatively small home ranges less than, or much less than, 1 ha. However, because even small snakes occasionally move large distances (e.g., up to at least 1.7 km in Diadophis punctatus, Fitch 1975). Also, these snakes tend to be secretive and may be easily overlooked or not recorded in areas where they do in fact occur. It seems unlikely that occupied locations separated by a gap of less than several kilometers of suitable habitat would represent independent occurrences over the long term.
Inferred Minimum Extent of Habitat Use (when actual extent is unknown): .2 km
Date: 21Sep2004
Author: Hammerson, G.
Notes: This specs group is a somewhat arbitrary assemblage of small snakes that are believed to be among the most sedentary species of the family Colubridae.
Population/Occurrence Viability
Help
U.S. Invasive Species Impact Rank (I-Rank) Not yet assessed
Help
Authors/Contributors
Help
NatureServe Conservation Status Factors Edition Date: 04Sep2006
NatureServe Conservation Status Factors Author: Hammerson, G.
Element Ecology & Life History Edition Date: 04Sep2006
Element Ecology & Life History Author(s): Hammerson, G.

Zoological data developed by NatureServe and its network of natural heritage programs (see Local Programs) and other contributors and cooperators (see Sources).

References
Help
  • Alfaro, M. E., and S. J. Arnold. 2001. Molecular systematics and evolution of Regina and the thamnophiine snakes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 21:408-423.

  • Ashton, R. E., Jr., and P. S. Ashton. 1981. Handbook of reptiles and amphibians of Florida. Part One: The Snakes. Windward Publishing Company, Miami, Florida. 176 pp.

  • Ashton, R.E., Jr. (compiler). 1976. Endangered and Threatened Amphibians and Reptiles in the United States. Herpetological Circular No. 5, Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles, Lawrence, Kansas. 65 pp.

  • Austen, M.J. and M.J. Oldham. 1999. COSSARO Candidate V, T, E Species Evaluation Form for Queen Snake (REGINA SEPTEMVITTATA). Committee on the Status of Species at Risk in Ontario (COSSARO). 6 pp. + 4 appendices.

  • Barbour, R. W. 1971. Amphibians and reptiles of Kentucky. Univ. Press of Kentucky, Lexington. x + 334 pp.

  • Behler, J. L., and F. W. King. 1979. The Audubon Society field guide to North American reptiles and amphibians. Alfred A. Knopf, New York. 719 pp.

  • Branson, B. A. and E. C. Baker. 1974. An ecological study ofthe queen snake, REGINA SEPTEMVITTATA (Say) in Kentucky. Tulane Stud. Zool. and Bot. 18(4):153-171.

  • Butler, J.A., G.H. Dalrymple and A. Hinko. 1980. Early spring feeding and comments on the physiological ecology of the Queen Snake, Regina septemvittata, in central Ohio. HERP Bulletin of the New York Herpetological Society 16(1): 3-9.

  • COSEWIC 2000. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the queen snake Regina septemvittata in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. vi + 28 pp.

  • Campbell, C.A. 1977. The range, ecology and status of the Queen Snake (Regina septemvittata) in Canada. Canadian Wildlife Service, Ottawa, Ontario. Unpublished report. 35 pp.

  • Campbell, C.A. and D.W. Perrin. 1979. A survey of the Queen Snake (Regina septemvittata) in southwestern Ontario. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Wildlife Branch, Toronto, Ontario. Unpublished report. 62 pp.

  • Campbell, C.A. and D.W. Perrin. 1980. The Queen Snake, Regina septemvittata (Say) Baird and Girard 1853, in Canada. 23rd Annual Meeting of the SSAR, and 28th Annual Meeting of Herpetologists' League, Milwakee, Wisconsin.

  • Collins, J. T. 1990. Standard common and current scientific names for North American amphibians and reptiles. 3rd ed. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles. Herpetological Circular No. 19. 41 pp.

  • Collins, J. T. 1997. Standard common and current scientific names for North American amphibians and reptiles. Fourth edition. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles, Herpetolgical Circular No. 25. 40 pp.

  • Conant, R., and J. T. Collins. 1998. A field guide to reptiles and amphibians: eastern and central North America. Third edition, expanded. Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston, Massachusetts. 616 pp.

  • Cook, F. R. 1984. Introduction to Canadian amphibians and reptiles. National Museum of Natural Sciences, National Museums of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario.

  • Critical Areas Program. 1985. Rare Vascular Plants of Maine. State Planning Office, Augusta, Maine. 681 pp.

  • Crother, B. I. (ed.). 2008. Scientific and Standard English Names of Amphibians and Reptiles of North America North of Mexico, with comments regarding confidence in our understanding: Sixth edition. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles, 94 pp.

  • Crother, B. I. (editor). 2008. Scientific and standard English names of amphibians and reptiles of North America north of Mexico, with comments regarding confidence in our understanding. Sixth edition. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles Herpetological Circular 37:1-84.

  • Crother, B. I. (editor). 2008. Scientific and standard English names of amphibians and reptiles of North America north of Mexico, with comments regarding confidence in our understanding. Sixth edition. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles Herpetological Circular 37:1-84. Online with updates at: http://www.ssarherps.org/pages/comm_names/Index.php

  • Crother, B. I. (editor). 2012. Scientific and standard English names of amphibians and reptiles of North America north of Mexico, with comments regarding confidence in our understanding. 7th edition. SSAR Herpetological Circular 39:1-92.

  • Ernst, C. H. 2002. Regina septemvittata. Catalogue of American Amphibians and Reptiles 757:1-5.

  • Ernst, C. H., J. W. Gibbons, and M. E. Dorcas. 2002. Regina. Catalogue of American Amphibians and Reptiles 756:1-4.

  • Ernst, C. H., and E. M. Ernst. 2003. Snakes of the United States and Canada. Smithsonian Books, Washington, D.C.

  • Fitch, H. S. 1970. Reproductive cycles of lizards and snakes. Univ. Kansas Museum Natural History Miscellaneous Publication 52:1-247.

  • Gibbons, J. W., and M. E. Dorcas. 2004. North American watersnakes: a natural history. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman. xxvi + 439 pp.

  • Green, N. B., and T. K. Pauley. 1987. Amphibians and reptiles in West Virginia. University of Pittsburg Press, Pittsburg, Pennsylvania. xi + 241 pp.

  • Guiasu, R.C., D.W. Barr and D.W. Dunham. 1996. Distribution and status of crayfishes of the genera Cambarus and Fallicambarus (Decapoda: Cambaridae) in Ontario, Canada. Journal of Crustacean Biology 16(2): 373-383.

  • Hammerson, G. 2001. EO Specs for Medium and Large Colubrid Snakes (ELCODE ARADB00002). NatureServe, unpublished. 2 pp.

  • Harding, J. H. 1997. Amphibians and reptiles of the Great Lakes region. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor. xvi + 378 pp.

  • Hulse, A. C., C. J. McCoy, and E. Censky. 2001. Amphibians and reptiles of Pennsylvania and the Northeast. Comstock Publishing Associates, Cornell University Press, Ithaca. 419 pp.

  • Johnson, T. R. 2000. The amphibians and reptiles of Missouri. Second edition. Missouri Department of Conservation, Jefferson City. 400 pp.

  • Judd, W.W. 1955. Observations on the habitat and food of the Queen snake, Natrix septemvittata, at London, Ontario. Canadian Field-Naturalist 69(4): 167-168.

  • Judd, W.W. 1962. Queen Snakes on the Ausable River at Arkona, Ontario. The Cardinal Flight #41 (January 1962). 2 pp.

  • Judd, W.W. 1974. Queen Snakes on the Ausable River at Arkona. Pp. 79-80, in, Vignettes of Nature in Southern Ontario. Carlton Press, Inc., New York.

  • Layne, Jr., J.R. and N.B. Ford. 1984. Flight distance of the Queen Snake, Regina septemvittata. Journal of Herpetology 18(4): 496-498.

  • LeRay, W.J. 1928. The Queen Snake (Natrix septemvittata) in Ontario. Canadian Field-Naturalist 42(2): 42.

  • Minton, S. A., Jr. 1972. Amphibians and reptiles of Indiana. Indiana Academy Science Monographs 3. v + 346 pp.

  • Minton, S. A., Jr. 2001. Amphibians & reptiles of Indiana. Revised second edition. Indiana Academy of Science, Indianapolis. xiv + 404 pp.

  • Mount, R. H. 1975. The reptiles and amphibians of Alabama. Auburn University Agricultural Experiment Station, Auburn, Alabama. vii + 347 pp.

  • Newcomer, R.T., D.H. Taylor and S.I. Guttman. 1974. Celestial orientation in two species of water snakes (Natrix sipedon and Regina septemvittata). Herpetologica 30: 194-200.

  • Oldham, M.J. 2000. Queen Snake (Regina Septemvittata) Canada Evaluation Using IUCN Criteria. . 1 pp.

  • Phillips, C. A., R. A. Brandon, and E. O. Moll. 1999. Field guide to amphibians and reptiles of Illinois. Illinois Natural History Survey Manual 8. xv + 282 pp.

  • Smith, H.M. and J.E. Huheey. 1960. The watersnake genus Regina. Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science 63(3): 156-164.

  • Smith, K. 1998. Status Report on the Queen Snake, REGINA SEPTEMVITTA, in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC), Ottawa, Ontario. DRAFT (February 1998). 27 pp.

  • Spangler, J.A. and R.H. Mount. 1969. The taxonomic status of the natricine snake, Regina septemvittata mabila (Neill). Herpetologica 25:113-119.

  • Spurr, R.H. and D.C. Smith. 1979. Sightings of Queen Snakes (Regina septemvittata) along the Ausable River near Arkona, Ontario. Unpublished report. Privately distributed. Mimeograph. 10 pp.

  • Vlasman, K. 2004. Recovery planning for the Queen Snake (Regina septemvittata). Provincial Species at Risk year-end report FY 2003-2004. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Vineland, Ontario.

  • Vogt, R. C. 1981c. Natural history of amphibians and reptiles of Wisconsin. Milwaukee Public Museum. 205 pp.

  • White, J. F., Jr., and A. W. White. 2002. Amphibians and reptiles of Delmarva. Tidewater Publishers, Centreville, Maryland. xvi + 248 pp.

  • Wood, J.T. 1949. Observations on Natrix septemvittata (Say) in southwestern Ohio. The American Midland Naturalist 42(3): 744-750.

Use Guidelines & Citation

Use Guidelines and Citation

The Small Print: Trademark, Copyright, Citation Guidelines, Restrictions on Use, and Information Disclaimer.

Note: All species and ecological community data presented in NatureServe Explorer at http://explorer.natureserve.org were updated to be current with NatureServe's central databases as of November 2016.
Note: This report was printed on

Trademark Notice: "NatureServe", NatureServe Explorer, The NatureServe logo, and all other names of NatureServe programs referenced herein are trademarks of NatureServe. Any other product or company names mentioned herein are the trademarks of their respective owners.

Copyright Notice: Copyright © 2017 NatureServe, 4600 N. Fairfax Dr., 7th Floor, Arlington Virginia 22203, U.S.A. All Rights Reserved. Each document delivered from this server or web site may contain other proprietary notices and copyright information relating to that document. The following citation should be used in any published materials which reference the web site.

Citation for data on website including State Distribution, Watershed, and Reptile Range maps:
NatureServe. 2017. NatureServe Explorer: An online encyclopedia of life [web application]. Version 7.1. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia. Available http://explorer.natureserve.org. (Accessed:

Citation for Bird Range Maps of North America:
Ridgely, R.S., T.F. Allnutt, T. Brooks, D.K. McNicol, D.W. Mehlman, B.E. Young, and J.R. Zook. 2003. Digital Distribution Maps of the Birds of the Western Hemisphere, version 1.0. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia, USA.

Acknowledgement Statement for Bird Range Maps of North America:
"Data provided by NatureServe in collaboration with Robert Ridgely, James Zook, The Nature Conservancy - Migratory Bird Program, Conservation International - CABS, World Wildlife Fund - US, and Environment Canada - WILDSPACE."

Citation for Mammal Range Maps of North America:
Patterson, B.D., G. Ceballos, W. Sechrest, M.F. Tognelli, T. Brooks, L. Luna, P. Ortega, I. Salazar, and B.E. Young. 2003. Digital Distribution Maps of the Mammals of the Western Hemisphere, version 1.0. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia, USA.

Acknowledgement Statement for Mammal Range Maps of North America:
"Data provided by NatureServe in collaboration with Bruce Patterson, Wes Sechrest, Marcelo Tognelli, Gerardo Ceballos, The Nature Conservancy-Migratory Bird Program, Conservation International-CABS, World Wildlife Fund-US, and Environment Canada-WILDSPACE."

Citation for Amphibian Range Maps of the Western Hemisphere:
IUCN, Conservation International, and NatureServe. 2004. Global Amphibian Assessment. IUCN, Conservation International, and NatureServe, Washington, DC and Arlington, Virginia, USA.

Acknowledgement Statement for Amphibian Range Maps of the Western Hemisphere:
"Data developed as part of the Global Amphibian Assessment and provided by IUCN-World Conservation Union, Conservation International and NatureServe."

NOTE: Full metadata for the Bird Range Maps of North America is available at:
http://www.natureserve.org/library/birdDistributionmapsmetadatav1.pdf.

Full metadata for the Mammal Range Maps of North America is available at:
http://www.natureserve.org/library/mammalsDistributionmetadatav1.pdf.

Restrictions on Use: Permission to use, copy and distribute documents delivered from this server is hereby granted under the following conditions:
  1. The above copyright notice must appear in all copies;
  2. Any use of the documents available from this server must be for informational purposes only and in no instance for commercial purposes;
  3. Some data may be downloaded to files and altered in format for analytical purposes, however the data should still be referenced using the citation above;
  4. No graphics available from this server can be used, copied or distributed separate from the accompanying text. Any rights not expressly granted herein are reserved by NatureServe. Nothing contained herein shall be construed as conferring by implication, estoppel, or otherwise any license or right under any trademark of NatureServe. No trademark owned by NatureServe may be used in advertising or promotion pertaining to the distribution of documents delivered from this server without specific advance permission from NatureServe. Except as expressly provided above, nothing contained herein shall be construed as conferring any license or right under any NatureServe copyright.
Information Warranty Disclaimer: All documents and related graphics provided by this server and any other documents which are referenced by or linked to this server are provided "as is" without warranty as to the currentness, completeness, or accuracy of any specific data. NatureServe hereby disclaims all warranties and conditions with regard to any documents provided by this server or any other documents which are referenced by or linked to this server, including but not limited to all implied warranties and conditions of merchantibility, fitness for a particular purpose, and non-infringement. NatureServe makes no representations about the suitability of the information delivered from this server or any other documents that are referenced to or linked to this server. In no event shall NatureServe be liable for any special, indirect, incidental, consequential damages, or for damages of any kind arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information contained in any documents provided by this server or in any other documents which are referenced by or linked to this server, under any theory of liability used. NatureServe may update or make changes to the documents provided by this server at any time without notice; however, NatureServe makes no commitment to update the information contained herein. Since the data in the central databases are continually being updated, it is advisable to refresh data retrieved at least once a year after its receipt. The data provided is for planning, assessment, and informational purposes. Site specific projects or activities should be reviewed for potential environmental impacts with appropriate regulatory agencies. If ground-disturbing activities are proposed on a site, the appropriate state natural heritage program(s) or conservation data center can be contacted for a site-specific review of the project area (see Visit Local Programs).

Feedback Request: NatureServe encourages users to let us know of any errors or significant omissions that you find in the data through (see Contact Us). Your comments will be very valuable in improving the overall quality of our databases for the benefit of all users.