Hybognathus placitus - Girard, 1856
Plains Minnow
Taxonomic Status: Accepted
Related ITIS Name(s): Hybognathus placitus Girard, 1856 (TSN 163361)
French Common Names: méné des plaines
Unique Identifier: ELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.106124
Element Code: AFCJB16050
Informal Taxonomy: Animals, Vertebrates - Fishes - Bony Fishes - Minnows and Carps
 
Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family Genus
Animalia Craniata Actinopterygii Cypriniformes Cyprinidae Hybognathus
Genus Size: C - Small genus (6-20 species)
Check this box to expand all report sections:
Concept Reference
Help
Concept Reference: Robins, C.R., R.M. Bailey, C.E. Bond, J.R. Brooker, E.A. Lachner, R.N. Lea, and W.B. Scott. 1991. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States and Canada. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 20. 183 pp.
Concept Reference Code: B91ROB01NAUS
Name Used in Concept Reference: Hybognathus placitus
Taxonomic Comments: See Schmidt (1994) for a phylogenetic analysis of the genus Hybognathus based on morphological data.
Conservation Status
Help

NatureServe Status

Global Status: G4
Global Status Last Reviewed: 15Feb2012
Global Status Last Changed: 27Aug1998
Ranking Methodology Used: Ranked by inspection
Rounded Global Status: G4 - Apparently Secure
Reasons: Moderately widespread in streams in central North America; substantial declines in abundance and distribution in some areas (Kansas, Nebraska, Missouri, and portions of Oklahoma); declining in the southern half of range and apparently stable in the northern portions of range; threatened by impoundments altering habitat and flow regimes; if northern populations begin to decline the rank should be reevaluated.
Nation: United States
National Status: N4 (28Aug1998)
Nation: Canada
National Status: N1 (09Sep2011)

U.S. & Canada State/Province Status
Due to latency between updates made in state, provincial or other NatureServe Network databases and when they appear on NatureServe Explorer, for state or provincial information you may wish to contact the data steward in your jurisdiction to obtain the most current data. Please refer to our Distribution Data Sources to find contact information for your jurisdiction.
United States Arkansas (SX), Colorado (SH), Illinois (S2), Iowa (S4), Kansas (S2S3), Kentucky (S1), Missouri (S2), Montana (S4), Nebraska (S4), New Mexico (S3), North Dakota (SNR), Oklahoma (S5), South Dakota (S5), Tennessee (S1), Texas (S4), Utah (SNA), Wyoming (S3)
Canada Saskatchewan (S1)

Other Statuses

Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC): Threatened (04May2012)
Comments on COSEWIC: This small fish has a very limited distribution in Canada at only one or two locations, both of which are small streams subject to drought. The species requires long stretches of flowing water to complete its life cycle. Further threats to water supply from additional irrigation dams and excessive drought would increase risks to this species.
Designated Threatened in May 2012.

IUCN Red List Category: LC - Least concern
American Fisheries Society Status: Vulnerable (01Aug2008)

NatureServe Global Conservation Status Factors

Range Extent: 200,000-2,500,000 square km (about 80,000-1,000,000 square miles)
Range Extent Comments: Range includes the Missouri, Arkansas, Red, Brazos, and Colorado river drainages, from Montana and North Dakota south through Colorado and Kansas (Scheurer et al. 2003) to New Mexico and Texas; Mississippi River from mouth of Missouri River to Tennessee (Page and Burr 2011). This species has been reported in Arkansas from the Arkansas, Mississippi, and Red rivers, but it is probably extirpated (Robison and Buchanan 1988). Species has been introduced into the Pecos drainage in New Mexico; also introduced in Utah (Lehtinen and Layzer 1988).

Number of Occurrences: 81 to >300
Number of Occurrences Comments: This species is represented by a large number of occurrences (subpopulations). In general, the number of occurrences appears to be low in Missouri, Kansas, Illinois, Kentucky, New Mexico, and in other states on the periphery of the range, but relatively large numbers of occurrences still exist in Oklahoma, Nebraska, Wyoming, North Dakota, and other northern portions of the range.

This is a small fish that inhabits large rivers and is difficult to survey (Ron Cicerello and Peggy Shute, pers. comm., 1998), so available data may not accurately reflect current distribution and abundance..

Population Size: 100,000 to >1,000,000 individuals
Population Size Comments: Total adult population size is unknown but very large. Page and Burr (2011) regarded this as "one of the most characteristic and common (sometimes abundant) fishes of Great Plains."

This species is considered to be abundant in the upper Missouri River watershed, whereas it is less numerous in areas farther south. During a 1993 survey, this was one of the most commonly collected species in the Little Missouri River, North Dakota (Kelsch 1994). During 1984-1988, Bazata et al. (1991) collected 208 individuals from 350 stream sites across Nebraska (excluding the Missouri River). This species is uncommon in the lower Mississippi River (Northern Prairie Research Center 1998).

Overall Threat Impact Comments: Threats are related to water management and flow modifications. Diversion of water has resulted in changes in flow regime in both mainstem rivers and tributary streams. Construction of passage barriers, such as diversion dams and reservoirs, have both degraded and fragmented habitat. Introduced non-native species have become both predators and competitors with the plains minnow. For example, expansion in abundance and range of blackstripe topminnow, bluegill, largemouth bass, and creek chub was associated with a decline of plains minnow and other native fish populations in the Missouri River (Winston 2002). Other threats include hybridization, altered flow regimes, disturbance of riparian zones, and landscape scale changes that reduce the natural function of the stream ecosystem. Source: Rees et al. (2005).

The elimination of highly variable water levels, unstable streambeds, and fluctuating water temperatures are among the reasons for declines (Cross et al. 1985). The Northern Prairie Research Center (1995) indicated that the greatest threats are nonpoint source pollution and mainstem impoundments impacting natural flow regimes and other threats across the range include dewatering of rivers from irrigation and degradation of riparian areas.

Elimination of flood events has removed the historical cues for spawning and reduced the quality and quantity of available spawning habitat (Wilde and Ostrand 1999). Degradation of braided channel systems due to highly modified flow regimes (e.g., reduction of peak flows, flow stability, reduced turbidity) has contributed to the decline in plains minnow populations in some drainages, such as the Arkansas River Basin in Colorado (Cross and Moss 1987).

Declines in the Canadian River drainage (Oklahoma and Texas) were probably due to the reduced occurrence of large floods (Bonner and Wilde 2000). The impoundment of the Double Mountain Fork in the Brazos River may have resulted in the extirpation of the plains minnow from reaches above the dam (Wilde and Ostrand 1999).

Damming of the North Fork of the Red River in southwestern Oklahoma may have eliminated populations above the dam (Winston et al. 1991). Threats in New Mexico include impoundments and dewatering; the species is possibly eliminated above Ute Reservoir on the Canadian River (Bob Larson, pers. comm., 1998).

According to Eberle (1995), declines in Kansas might be tied to changes in flow regimes of rivers following dam construction and dewatering. Declines in the Arkansas River drainage have been attributed to the effects of impoundments, land use, diversion of surface flow for irrigation, and reduction of water table levels in response to mining of groundwater for irrigation (Cross and Moss 1987).

The degree of threat is not known across most of the range, but has been estimated by some heritage programs to range from very threatened to not very threatened; very threatened in Kansas (Bill Busby, pers. comm., 1998), not very threatened in North Dakota (Greg Power, pers. comm., 1998), and not very threatened to unthreatened in Kentucky (Ron Cicerello, pers. comm., 1998).

Short-term Trend: Decline of 10-30%
Short-term Trend Comments: Trend over the past 10 years or three generations is uncertain, but distribution and abundance probably are still declining (Rees et al. 2005). Three generations are fewer than 10 years. The rate of decline probably is less than 30 percent over 10 years.

This species is doing relatively well in Oklahoma, North Dakota, South Dakota, Montana, Nebraska, and Iowa, but its range has been restricted in some areas of these states (Rees et al. 2005). Stable populations exist in various areas, including streams in eastern Wyoming, western and central Nebraska, and western Kansas (Rees et al. 2005).. Populations in most other states in the range are in decline (Rees et al. 2005).

Long-term Trend:  
Long-term Trend Comments: Over the long term, this species has undergone a large decline in distribution and abundance (Rees et al. 2005).

Baxter and Simon (1970) stated that plains minnows were virtually eliminated from the North Platte River, Wyoming, but indicated that the species is not really in trouble statewide. However, based on a comparison of 1960 data and sampling data from the 1990s, the species may be declining in Wyoming (Mary Neighbours, pers. comm., 1998).

According to Hesse (1994), plains/western silvery minnows were once considered abundant in Nebraska, but surveys over the past three decades indicate possible declines in some areas. During 1976-1978 Hesse (1994) collected 40 plains/silvery minnows from the lower Niobrara River while zero were collected in 1991. During Missouri River studies conducted from 1970-1993 the percent composition of seined plains/western silvery minnows in the channelized portion of the river was 27.1 in 1970 and zero in 1993; the percent composition of plains/western silvery minnows in the unchannelized Missouri River above and below Gavins Point Dam was less than one percent from 1983-1993 (Hesse 1994). Although declines have occurred in some areas of Nebraska, the species may be stable in the remainder of the state (Mike Fritz, pers. comm., 1998).

This species has undergone dramatic declines in abundance throughout Missouri in recent decades; if declines continue it may soon be extirpated from the state (Pflieger 1997).

Historically, plains minnows were considered abundant in Kansas rivers (Cross 1967), but more recently have been reported to have decreased substantially in the Arkansas, Smoky Hill, and Republican river drainages (Cross et al., 1985, Eberle 1995, Eberle et al. 1997). Historically this species was the most common fish of the Arkansas River system, but its abundance and distribution have decreased substantially in the Arkansas River drainage in Kansas (Cross and Moss 1987, Taylor and Miller 1990). It has declined to less than 1 percent of the overall fish population in the Arkansas River (Cross and Moss 1987). Plains minnows formerly were common and widespread in the Kansas River drainage but have declined dramatically throughout that system (Wenke et al 1993). The species may be extirpated from portions of the western Kansas River drainage, including the Republican, Solomon, Saline, and Smoky Hill rivers, and it is now rare in the lower portion of the Kansas River drainage (Cross and Moss 1987, Wenke et al. 1993).

This is "one of Oklahoma's ubiquitous species" but "recent declines...in the large rivers of Oklahoma are the cause of some concern (W. J. Matthews, pers. comm., 2003)" (Miller and Robison 2004). The species is rare or extirpated in many reaches of the Cimarron River, northwestern Oklahoma, where formerly abundant (Pigg 1987, Taylor and Miller 1990) and possibly extirpated from the North Fork of the Red River above Altus Dam (Winston et al. 1991).

Plains minnows historically were the dominant species in the Canadian River drainage in Oklahoma and Texas, but now they are very rare (Bonner and Wilde 2000). These fishes formerly were dominant in the Double Mountain Fork of the Brazos River, Texas, but now are extirpated from areas above the Lake Alan Henry Reservoir (Wilde and Ostrand 1999).

The species is probably extirpated in Arkansas (Robison and Buchanan 1988).

In New Mexico. Plains minnows are possibly extirpated from the Dry Cimarron River and the Canadian River above the Ute Reservoir; populations in in the Canadian River below Ute Reservoir are possibly stable (Bob Larson and David Propst, pers. comm., 1998). In the Pecos River, New Mexico, this introduced species is displacing the native Hybognathus amarus (New Mexico Department of Game and Fish 1997; Bob Larson, pers. comm., 1998).

Other NatureServe Conservation Status Information

Distribution
Help
Global Range: (200,000-2,500,000 square km (about 80,000-1,000,000 square miles)) Range includes the Missouri, Arkansas, Red, Brazos, and Colorado river drainages, from Montana and North Dakota south through Colorado and Kansas (Scheurer et al. 2003) to New Mexico and Texas; Mississippi River from mouth of Missouri River to Tennessee (Page and Burr 2011). This species has been reported in Arkansas from the Arkansas, Mississippi, and Red rivers, but it is probably extirpated (Robison and Buchanan 1988). Species has been introduced into the Pecos drainage in New Mexico; also introduced in Utah (Lehtinen and Layzer 1988).

U.S. States and Canadian Provinces

Due to latency between updates made in state, provincial or other NatureServe Network databases and when they appear on NatureServe Explorer, for state or provincial information you may wish to contact the data steward in your jurisdiction to obtain the most current data. Please refer to our Distribution Data Sources to find contact information for your jurisdiction.
Color legend for Distribution Map
Endemism: occurs (regularly, as a native taxon) in multiple nations

U.S. & Canada State/Province Distribution
United States ARextirpated, CO, IA, IL, KS, KY, MO, MT, ND, NE, NM, OK, SD, TN, TX, UTexotic, WY
Canada SK

Range Map
No map available.


U.S. Distribution by County Help
State County Name (FIPS Code)
AR Crawford (05033)*, Johnson (05071)*, Lafayette (05073)*, Logan (05083)*, Miller (05091)*, Mississippi (05093)*, Pope (05115)*, Sebastian (05131)*, Yell (05149)*
KS Barber (20007), Clark (20025), Clay (20027), Cloud (20029), Comanche (20033), Doniphan (20043), Douglas (20045), Gove (20063), Jewell (20089), Kingman (20095), Leavenworth (20103), Logan (20109), Meade (20119), Pratt (20151), Republic (20157), Riley (20161), Sedgwick (20173), Trego (20195), Washington (20201), Wyandotte (20209)
KY Ballard (21007)*, Carlisle (21039)*, Fulton (21075)
MO Adair (29001)*, Andrew (29003), Atchison (29005), Boone (29019), Buchanan (29021), Caldwell (29025)*, Callaway (29027), Cape Girardeau (29031), Carroll (29033), Chariton (29041), Clay (29047), Cole (29051), Cooper (29053), Daviess (29061)*, Franklin (29071), Gasconade (29073), Gentry (29075), Grundy (29079)*, Harrison (29081)*, Holt (29087), Howard (29089), Jackson (29095), Jefferson (29099)*, Johnson (29101)*, Lafayette (29107), Livingston (29117), Mercer (29129)*, Mississippi (29133), Moniteau (29135), Montgomery (29139), Nodaway (29147), Osage (29151), Pemiscot (29155), Perry (29157)*, Pettis (29159)*, Platte (29165), Putnam (29171), Ray (29177), Saline (29195), Scott (29201), St. Charles (29183), St. Louis (29189), Ste. Genevieve (29186)*, Stoddard (29207), Sullivan (29211)*, Warren (29219), Worth (29227)
NE Adams (31001), Boone (31011), Boyd (31015), Brown (31017), Buffalo (31019), Burt (31021), Butler (31023), Cass (31025), Cherry (31031), Cuming (31039), Custer (31041), Dakota (31043), Dixon (31051), Dodge (31053), Douglas (31055), Dundy (31057), Franklin (31061), Garden (31069), Hall (31079), Hamilton (31081), Hitchcock (31087), Holt (31089), Lincoln (31111), Loup (31115), Merrick (31121), Morrill (31123), Nemaha (31127), Nuckolls (31129), Otoe (31131), Pierce (31139), Platte (31141), Red Willow (31145), Richardson (31147), Sarpy (31153), Saunders (31155), Scotts Bluff (31157), Sherman (31163), Thurston (31173), Washington (31177), Webster (31181)
NM Chaves (35005)*, Colfax (35007)*, De Baca (35011)*, Eddy (35015)*, Guadalupe (35019)*, Harding (35021)*, Mora (35033)*, Quay (35037)*, San Miguel (35047)*, Union (35059)*
SD Custer (46033), Jackson (46071), Mellette (46095), Pennington (46103), Todd (46121), Tripp (46123)
TN Lauderdale (47097), Obion (47131)
* Extirpated/possibly extirpated
U.S. Distribution by Watershed Help
Watershed Region Help Watershed Name (Watershed Code)
05 Lower Ohio (05140206)+*
07 Peruque-Piasa (07110009)+, Cahokia-Joachim (07140101)+, Upper Mississippi-Cape Girardeau (07140105)+, Whitewater (07140107)+, Lower Kaskaskia (07140204)*
08 Lower Mississippi-Memphis (08010100)+, Bayou De Chien-Mayfield (08010201)+*, Obion (08010202)+, South Fork Obion (08010203)+, Lower Hatchie (08010208)+, New Madrid-St. Johns (08020201)+, Lower St. Francis (08020203)+
10 Teton (10030205), Bullwhacker-Dog (10040101), Fort Peck Reservoir (10040104), Big Dry (10040105), Little Dry (10040106), Middle Musselshell (10040202), Lower Musselshell (10040205), Middle Milk (10050004), Big Sandy (10050005), Peoples (10050009), Cottonwood (10050010), Whitewater (10050011), Lower Milk (10050012), Frenchman (10050013), Beaver (10050014), Rock (10050015), Porcupine (10050016), Prarie Elk-Wolf (10060001), Redwater (10060002), Poplar (10060003), West Fork Poplar (10060004), Charlie-Little Muddy (10060005), Big Muddy (10060006), Brush Lake closed basin (10060007), Upper Yellowstone-Pompeys Pillar (10070007), Big Horn Lake (10080010), Lower Bighorn (10080015), Little Bighorn (10080016), Upper Tongue (10090101), Lower Tongue (10090102), Upper Powder (10090202), South Fork Powder (10090203), Salt (10090204), Crazy Woman (10090205), Clear (10090206), Middle Powder (10090207), Little Powder (10090208), Lower Powder (10090209), Mizpah (10090210), Lower Yellowstone-Sunday (10100001), Big Porcupine (10100002), Rosebud (10100003), Lower Yellowstone (10100004), O'fallon (10100005), Upper Little Missouri (10110201), Boxelder (10110202), Middle Little Missouri (10110203), Beaver (10110204), Lower Little Missouri (10110205), Antelope (10120101), Upper Cheyenne (10120103), Lance (10120104), Lightning (10120105)*, Angostura Reservoir (10120106), Beaver (10120107), Middle Cheyenne-Spring (10120109)+, Middle Cheyenne-Elk (10120111)+, Upper Belle Fourche (10120201), Lower Belle Fourche (10120202), Redwater (10120203), Upper Heart (10130202), South Fork Grand (10130302), Lower Moreau (10130306), Bad (10140102), Upper White (10140201), Middle White (10140202)+, Little White (10140203)+, Ponca (10150001), Middle Niobrara (10150004)+, Keya Paha (10150006)+, Lewis and Clark Lake (10170101)+, Glendo Reservoir (10180008)*, Middle North Platte-Scotts Bluff (10180009)+, Lower North Platte (10180014)+, St. Vrain (10190005)*, Middle South Platte-Sterling (10190012)*, Lower South Platte (10190018)+, Middle Platte-Buffalo (10200101)+, Wood (10200102)+, Middle Platte-Prairie (10200103)+, Lower Platte-Shell (10200201), Lower Platte (10200202)+, Salt (10200203)+, Lower Middle Loup (10210003)+, South Loup (10210004)+, Upper North Loup (10210006)+, Lower North Loup (10210007)+, Loup (10210009)+, Upper Elkhorn (10220001)+, North Fork Elkhorn (10220002)+, Lower Elkhorn (10220003)+, Logan (10220004)+, Blackbird-Soldier (10230001)+, Little Sioux (10230003)*, Monona-Harrison Ditch (10230004)*, Big Papillion-Mosquito (10230006)+, Boyer (10230007)*, Keg-Weeping Water (10240001)+, West Nishnabotna (10240002), Nishnabotna (10240004)+, Tarkio-Wolf (10240005)+, Little Nemaha (10240006)+, South Fork Big Nemaha (10240007), Big Nemaha (10240008), Nodaway (10240010)+, Independence-Sugar (10240011)+, Platte (10240012)+*, Arikaree (10250001)*, North Fork Republican (10250002)+, South Fork Republican (10250003)*, Upper Republican (10250004)+, Harlan County Reservoir (10250009), Lower Sappa (10250011)*, Little Beaver (10250013)*, Prairie Dog (10250015)*, Middle Republican (10250016)+, Lower Republican (10250017)+, Smoky Hill Headwaters (10260001)*, Upper Smoky Hill (10260003)+, Ladder (10260004)+, Middle Smoky Hill (10260006), Big (10260007)*, Lower Smoky Hill (10260008), Upper Saline (10260009)*, Upper North Fork Solomon (10260011)*, Lower North Fork Solomon (10260012)*, Lower South Fork Solomon (10260014)*, Solomon (10260015)*, Upper Kansas (10270101)+, Middle Kansas (10270102), Delaware (10270103), Lower Kansas (10270104)+, Lower Big Blue (10270205), Upper Little Blue (10270206)+, Upper Grand (10280101)+, Thompson (10280102)+, Lower Grand (10280103)+, Upper Chariton (10280201)+, Lower Chariton (10280202)+, Little Chariton (10280203)+, Lower Missouri-Crooked (10300101)+, Lower Missouri-Moreau (10300102)+, Lamine (10300103)+*, Blackwater (10300104)+*, Lower Missouri (10300200)+
11 Upper Arkansas-Lake Meredith (11020005)*, Upper Arkansas-John Martin (11020009)*, Middle Arkansas-Lake Mckinney (11030001)*, Arkansas-Dodge City (11030003)*, Coon-Pickerel (11030004)*, Pawnee (11030005)*, Buckner (11030006)*, Rattlesnake (11030009)*, Gar-Peace (11030010), Middle Arkansas-Slate (11030013)+, North Fork Ninnescah (11030014), South Fork Ninnescah (11030015)+, Ninnescah (11030016)+, Lower Walnut River (11030018), Cimarron headwaters (11040001)+, Upper Cimarron (11040002)*, North Fork Cimarron (11040003)*, Upper Cimarron-Liberal (11040006)+, Crooked (11040007)+, Upper Cimarron-Bluff (11040008)+, Lower Cimarron-Eagle Chief (11050001), Lower Cimarron-Skeleton (11050002), Lower Cimarron (11050003), Kaw Lake (11060001), Upper Salt Fork Arkansas (11060002)+, Medicine Lodge (11060003)+, Lower Salt Fork Arkansas (11060004), Chikaskia (11060005), Black Bear-Red Rock (11060006), Upper Verdigris (11070101), Fall (11070102), Middle Neosho (11070205), Lake O' the Cherokees (11070206), Spring (11070207), Canadian headwaters (11080001)+, Cimarron (11080002)+, Upper Canadian (11080003)+, Conchas (11080005)+*, Upper Canadian-Ute Reservoir (11080006)+, Ute (11080007)+*, Revuelto (11080008)+, Middle Canadian-Trujillo (11090101), Middle Canadian-Spring (11090106), Lower Canadian-Deer (11090201), Lower Canadian-Walnut (11090202), Little (11090203), Lower Canadian (11090204), Middle Beaver (11100102), Coldwater (11100103), Palo Duro (11100104), Lower Beaver (11100201), Lower Wolf (11100203), Middle North Canadian (11100301), Lower North Canadian (11100302), Polecat-Snake (11110101), Dirty-Greenleaf (11110102), Robert S. Kerr Reservoir (11110104)+, Frog-Mulberry (11110201)+*, Dardanelle Reservoir (11110202)+*, Lake Conway-Point Remove (11110203)+*, Upper Prairie Dog Town Fork Red (11120103), Lower Salt Fork Red (11120202), Middle North Fork Red (11120302), Lower North Fork Red (11120303), Elm Fork Red (11120304), Groesbeck-Sandy (11130101), Blue-China (11130102), North Pease (11130103), Farmers-Mud (11130201), West Cache (11130203), North Wichita (11130204), South Wichita (11130205), Southern Beaver (11130207), Lake Texoma (11130210), Washita headwaters (11130301), Upper Washita (11130302), Middle Washita (11130303), Lower Washita (11130304), Bois D'arc-Island (11140101), Pecan-Waterhole (11140106), Mckinney-Posten Bayous (11140201)+*, Lower Sulphur (11140302)+*
12 Salt Fork Brazos (12050007), Middle Brazos-Millers (12060101), Middle Brazos-Palo Pinto (12060201), Middle Brazos-Lake Whitney (12060202), Colorado headwaters (12080002), Middle Concho (12090103), Middle Colorado (12090106)
13 Pecos headwaters (13060001)+, Upper Pecos (13060003)+, Taiban (13060004)+*, Upper Pecos-Long Arroyo (13060007)+, Rio Hondo (13060008)+*, Upper Pecos-Black (13060011)+
+ Natural heritage record(s) exist for this watershed
* Extirpated/possibly extirpated
U.S. Distribution by Watershed (based on multiple information sources) Help
Ecology & Life History
Help
Basic Description: A medium-sized minnow, to five inches (plains minnow).
Reproduction Comments: Spawns in spring and summer. Egg laying may occur only during periods of high flow. Probably spawns communally (Lee et al. 1980). In north-central Oklahoma, reproducing females collected late April-July; ovarian weights peaked in June; females first spawned in their 2nd summer; apparently multiple peaks in spawning activity which may coincide with high water conditions (Lehtinen and Layzer 1988). In Cimarron River, Oklahoma, reproduction peaked in May and mid-summer; coincided with high or receding flows; individuals short-lived, most reproduced and died in their second summer (Taylor and Miller 1990).
Ecology Comments: Travels in schools. Has displaced H. AMARUS in Pecos River, New Mexico (Sublette et al. 1990).
Habitat Type: Freshwater
Non-Migrant: N
Locally Migrant: N
Long Distance Migrant: N
Riverine Habitat(s): BIG RIVER, Low gradient, MEDIUM RIVER, Pool
Habitat Comments: Habitat includes shallow sandy runs and pools of creeks and small to medium rivers (Page and Burr 2011); silt-laden rivers, slower water and side pools of silty streams; large streams and rivers over beds of sand and silt with some current (Lehtinen and Layzer 1988); clear to highly turbid rivers and creeks with sandy bottoms, high levels of dissolved solids, and slight to moderate erratic flows (Sublette et al. 1990). Eggs probably are scattered over silt-bottomed backwaters.
Adult Food Habits: Herbivore
Immature Food Habits: Herbivore
Food Comments: Scrapes algae, diatoms, and other microflora from aufwuchs assemblage on rocks, snags, and plant roots on bottom or along stream margin (Sublette et al. 1990); may take some aquatic invertebrates as well.
Length: 13 centimeters
Economic Attributes Not yet assessed
Help
Management Summary
Help
Biological Research Needs: Better information is needed on current distribution, abundance, and population trend.
Population/Occurrence Delineation
Help
Group Name: Small Cyprinids

Use Class: Not applicable
Minimum Criteria for an Occurrence: Occurrences are based on evidence of historical presence, or current and likely recurring presence, at a given location. Such evidence minimally includes collection or reliable observation and documentation of one or more individuals (including eggs and larvae) in appropriate habitat.
Separation Barriers: Dam lacking a suitable fishway; high waterfall; upland habitat. For some species (e.g., slender chub), an impoundment may constitute a barrier. For others (e.g., flame chub) a stream larger than 4th order may be a barrier.
Separation Distance for Unsuitable Habitat: 10 km
Separation Distance for Suitable Habitat: 10 km
Separation Justification: Data on dispersal and other movements generally are not available. In some species, individuals may migrate variable distances between spawning areas and nonspawning habitats.

Separation distances (in aquatic kilometers) for cyprinids are arbitrary but reflect the presumption that movements and appropriate separation distances generally should increase with fish size. Hence small, medium, and large cyprinids, respectively, have increasingly large separation distances. Separation distance reflects the likely low probability that two occupied locations separated by less than several kilometers of aquatic habitat would represent truly independent populations over the long term.

Because of the difficulty in defining suitable versus unsuitable habitat, especially with respect to dispersal, and to simplify the delineation of occurrences, a single separation distance is used regardless of habitat quality.

Occupied locations that are separated by a gap of 10 km or more of any aquatic habitat that is not known to be occupied represent different occurrences. However, it is important to evaluate seasonal changes in habitat to ensure that an occupied habitat occurrence for a particular population does not artificially separate spawning areas and nonspawning areas as different occurrences simply because there have been no collections/observations in an intervening area that may exceed the separation distance.

Date: 21Sep2004
Author: Hammerson, G.
Population/Occurrence Viability
Help
U.S. Invasive Species Impact Rank (I-Rank) Not yet assessed
Help
Authors/Contributors
Help
NatureServe Conservation Status Factors Edition Date: 08Aug2012
NatureServe Conservation Status Factors Author: Hammerson, G., and M. K. Clausen
Element Ecology & Life History Edition Date: 15Feb2012
Element Ecology & Life History Author(s): Hammerson, G.

Zoological data developed by NatureServe and its network of natural heritage programs (see Local Programs) and other contributors and cooperators (see Sources).

References
Help
  • Andersen, M.D. and B. Heidel. 2011. HUC-based species range maps. Prepared by Wyoming Natural Diversity Database for use in the pilot WISDOM application operational from inception to yet-to-be-determined date of update of tool.

  • Baxter, G.T. and M.D. Stone. 1995. Fishes of Wyoming. Wyoming Game and Fish Department, Cheyenne, Wyoming. 290 pp.

  • Bazata, K. 1991. Nebraska stream classification study. Lincoln, Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality.

  • Buchanan, T. M. and H. W. Robison. 1994. A recent record of the Plains Minnow, Hybognathus placitus Girard, from Arkansas. Proceedings of the Arkansas Academy of Science 48: 242.

  • Cross, F. B. 1967. Handbook of fishes of Kansas. University of Kansas Museum of Natural History Miscellaneous Publication No. 45. 357 pp.

  • Cross, F. B. and R. E. Moss. 1987. Historic changes in fish communities and aquatic habitats in plains streams of Kansas. Pages 155-165 in W.J. Matthews and D.C. Heins (editors). Community and evolutionary ecology of North American stream fishes. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, Oklahoma.

  • Cross, F. B., R. E. Moss, and J. T. Collins. 1985. Assessment of dewatering impacts on stream fisheries in the Arkansas and Cimarron rivers. University of Kansas Museum of Natural History, Lawrence, Kansas. 161 pp.

  • Eberle, M. E. 1995. Status of the plains minnow (Hybognathus placitus Girard) in the Smoky Hill and Republican river basins of Kansas. Nongame Program Report, Kansas Department of Wildlife and Parks, Emporia and Pratt. 7pp.

  • Eberle, M., S. Hoofer, N. Mandrak, and T. Wenke. 1997. Assessment of fish communities in western Kansas streams during 1994-1996. Nongame Program Report, Kansas Department of Wildlife and Parks, Emporia and Pratt. 8 pp.

  • Hesse, L. W. 1994. The status of Nebraska fishes in the Missouri River, 5. selected chubs and minnows (Cyprinidae): sicklefin chub (Macrhybopsis meeki), sturgeon chub (M. gelida), silver chub (M. storeriana), speckled chub (M. aestivalis), flathead chub (Platygobio gracilis), plains minnow (Hybognathus placitus), and western silvery minnow (H.argyritis). Transactions of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences 21:99-108.

  • Jelks, H. L., S. J. Walsh, N. M. Burkhead, S. Contreras-Balderas, E. Díaz-Pardo, D. A. Hendrickson, J. Lyons, N. E. Mandrak, F. McCormick, J. S. Nelson, S. P. Platania, B. A. Porter, C. B. Renaud, J. Jacobo Schmitter-Soto, E. B. Taylor, and M.L. Warren, Jr. 2008. Conservation status of imperiled North American freshwater and diadromous fishes. Fisheries 33(8):372-407.

  • Kelsch, S. W. 1994. Lotic fish-community structure following transition from severe drought to high discharge. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 9(4): 331-341.

  • Lehtinen, S. F. and J. B. Layzer. 1988. Reproductive cycle of the plains minnow, Hybognathus placitus (Cyprinidae), in the Cimarron River, Oklahoma. Southwestern Naturalist 33:27-33.

  • Miller, R. J., and H. W. Robison. 2004. Fishes of Oklahoma. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman. 450 pp.

  • Nelson, J. S., E. J. Crossman, H. Espinosa-Perez, L. T. Findley, C. R. Gilbert, R. N. Lea, and J. D. Williams. 2004. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States, Canada, and Mexico. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 29, Bethesda, Maryland. 386 pp.

  • New Mexico Department of Game and Fish. 1997. Fish and Wildlife Information Exchange--VA Tech. Online. Available: http://www.fw.vt.edu/fishex/nm.htm. Accessed 14 April 1998, last update 29 October 1997.

  • Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center. 1995. North Dakota's federally listed endangered, threatened, and candidate species: plains minnow (Hybognathus placitus). Available online: http://www.npwrc.usgs.gov/resource/distr/others/nddanger/spe cies/hyboplac.htm.

  • Page, L. M., H. Espinosa-Pérez, L. T. Findley, C. R. Gilbert, R. N. Lea, N. E. Mandrak, R. L. Mayden, and J. S. Nelson. 2013. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States, Canada, and Mexico. Seventh edition. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 34, Bethesda, Maryland.

  • Page, L. M., and B. M. Burr. 1991. A field guide to freshwater fishes: North America north of Mexico. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, Massachusetts. 432 pp.

  • Page, L. M., and B. M. Burr. 2011. Peterson field guide to freshwater fishes of North America north of Mexico. Second edition. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Boston. xix + 663 pp.

  • Patton, T. M. 1997. Distribution and status of fishes in the Missouri River drainage in Wyoming: Implications for identifying conservation areas. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming.

  • Peters, E. J., and R. S. Holland. 1994. Biological and economic analyses of the fish communities in the Platte River: modifications and tests of habitat suitability criteria for fishes of the Platte River. Federal Aid in Fish Restoration Project No. F-78-R Study III: Job III-2. University of Nebraska, Lincoln.

  • Pflieger, W. L. 1997a. Fishes of Missouri. Revised Edition. Missouri Department of Conservation, Jefferson City, Missouri.

  • Pflieger, W. L. and T. B. Grace. 1987. Changes in the fish fauna of the lower Missouri River, 1940-1983. Pages 166-181 in W. J. Matthews and D. C Heins (editors). Community and Evolutionary Ecology of North American Stream Fishes. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, Oklahoma.

  • Pigg, J. 1987. Survey of fishes in the Oklahoma panhandle and Harper County, northwestern Oklahoma. Proceedings of the Oklahoma Academy of Science 67:45-59.

  • Rees, D. E., R. J. Carr, and W. J. Miller. 2005. Plains minnow (Hybognathus placitus): a technical conservation assessment. [Online]. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region.

  • Robins, C.R., R.M. Bailey, C.E. Bond, J.R. Brooker, E.A. Lachner, R.N. Lea, and W.B. Scott. 1991. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States and Canada. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 20. 183 pp.

  • Scheurer, J. A., K. R. Bestgen, and K. D. Fausch. 2003. Resolving taxonomy and historic distribution for conservation of rare Great Plains fishes: Hybognathus (Teleostei: Cyprinidae) in eastern Colorado basins. Copeia 2003:1-12.

  • Schmidt, T. R. 1994. Phylogenetic relationships of the genus Hybognathus (Teleostei: Cyprinidae). Copeia 1994:622-630.

  • Taylor, C. M., and R. J. Miller. 1990. Reproductive ecology and population structure of the plains minnow, Hybognathus placitus (Pisces: Cyprinidae), in central Oklahoma. American Midland Naturalist 123:32-39.

  • Wenke, T. L., G. W. Ernstring, and M. E. Eberle. 1993. Survey of river fishes at Fort Riley Military Reservation in Kansas. Prairie Naturalist 25:317-323.

  • Wilde, G. R., and K. G. Ostrand. 1999. Changes in the fish assemblage of an intermittent prairie stream upstream from a Texas impoundment. Texas Journal of Science 51W:203-210.

  • Winston, M. R., C. M. Taylor, and J. Pigg. 1991. Upstream extirpation of four minnow species due to damming of a prairie stream. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 120:98-105.

  • Winston, M.R. 2002b. Spatial and temporal species associations with the Topeka shiner (Notropis topeka) in Missouri. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 17:249-261.

References for Watershed Distribution Map
  • Baxter, G. T., and J. R. Simon. 1970. Wyoming fishes. Wyoming Game and Fish Department, Cheyenne, Wyoming, 168 pp.

  • Burr, B. M., and M. L. Warren, Jr. 1986a. Distributional atlas of Kentucky fishes. Kentucky Nature Preserves Commission, Scientific and Technical Series No. 4, Frankfort, Kentucky. 398 pp.

  • Cross, F. B., and J. T. Collins. 1995. Fishes in Kansas. Second Edition, revised. University of Kansas Museum of Natural History. xvii + 315 pp.

  • Etnier, D. A., and W. C. Starnes. 1993. The fishes of Tennessee. University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville, Tennessee. xiv + 681 pp.

  • Harlan, J. R., E. B. Speaker, and J. Mayhew. 1987. Iowa fish and fishing. Iowa Conservation Commission, Des Moines, Iowa. 323 pp.

  • Holton, G. D., and H. E. Johnson. 1996. A field guide to Montana fishes. 2nd edition. Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks, Montana State Parks and wildlife Interpretive Association, Helena, Montana. 104 pp.

  • Lee, D. S., C. R. Gilbert, C. H. Hocutt, R. E. Jenkins, D. E. McAllister, and J. R. Stauffer, Jr. 1980. Atlas of North American freshwater fishes. North Carolina State Museum of Natural History, Raleigh, North Carolina. i-x + 854 pp.

  • Pflieger, W. L. 1975. The fishes of Missouri. Missouri Department of Conservation. Columbia, Missouri. viii + 343 pp.

  • Robison, H. W. and T. M. Buchanan. 1988. Fishes of Arkansas. The University of Arkansas Press, Fayetteville, Arkansas. 536 pp.

  • Smith, P. W. 1979. The fishes of Illinois. University of Illinois Press, Urbana. 314 pp.

  • State Natural Heritage Data Centers. 1996a. Aggregated element occurrence data from all U.S. state natural heritage programs, including the Tennessee Valley Authority, Navajo Nation and the District of Columbia. Science Division, The Nature Conservancy.

  • Sublette, J. E., M. D Hatch, and M. Sublette. 1990. The fishes of New Mexico. University New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, New Mexico. 393 pp.

Use Guidelines & Citation

Use Guidelines and Citation

The Small Print: Trademark, Copyright, Citation Guidelines, Restrictions on Use, and Information Disclaimer.

Note: All species and ecological community data presented in NatureServe Explorer at http://explorer.natureserve.org were updated to be current with NatureServe's central databases as of November 2016.
Note: This report was printed on

Trademark Notice: "NatureServe", NatureServe Explorer, The NatureServe logo, and all other names of NatureServe programs referenced herein are trademarks of NatureServe. Any other product or company names mentioned herein are the trademarks of their respective owners.

Copyright Notice: Copyright © 2017 NatureServe, 4600 N. Fairfax Dr., 7th Floor, Arlington Virginia 22203, U.S.A. All Rights Reserved. Each document delivered from this server or web site may contain other proprietary notices and copyright information relating to that document. The following citation should be used in any published materials which reference the web site.

Citation for data on website including State Distribution, Watershed, and Reptile Range maps:
NatureServe. 2017. NatureServe Explorer: An online encyclopedia of life [web application]. Version 7.1. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia. Available http://explorer.natureserve.org. (Accessed:

Citation for Bird Range Maps of North America:
Ridgely, R.S., T.F. Allnutt, T. Brooks, D.K. McNicol, D.W. Mehlman, B.E. Young, and J.R. Zook. 2003. Digital Distribution Maps of the Birds of the Western Hemisphere, version 1.0. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia, USA.

Acknowledgement Statement for Bird Range Maps of North America:
"Data provided by NatureServe in collaboration with Robert Ridgely, James Zook, The Nature Conservancy - Migratory Bird Program, Conservation International - CABS, World Wildlife Fund - US, and Environment Canada - WILDSPACE."

Citation for Mammal Range Maps of North America:
Patterson, B.D., G. Ceballos, W. Sechrest, M.F. Tognelli, T. Brooks, L. Luna, P. Ortega, I. Salazar, and B.E. Young. 2003. Digital Distribution Maps of the Mammals of the Western Hemisphere, version 1.0. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia, USA.

Acknowledgement Statement for Mammal Range Maps of North America:
"Data provided by NatureServe in collaboration with Bruce Patterson, Wes Sechrest, Marcelo Tognelli, Gerardo Ceballos, The Nature Conservancy-Migratory Bird Program, Conservation International-CABS, World Wildlife Fund-US, and Environment Canada-WILDSPACE."

Citation for Amphibian Range Maps of the Western Hemisphere:
IUCN, Conservation International, and NatureServe. 2004. Global Amphibian Assessment. IUCN, Conservation International, and NatureServe, Washington, DC and Arlington, Virginia, USA.

Acknowledgement Statement for Amphibian Range Maps of the Western Hemisphere:
"Data developed as part of the Global Amphibian Assessment and provided by IUCN-World Conservation Union, Conservation International and NatureServe."

NOTE: Full metadata for the Bird Range Maps of North America is available at:
http://www.natureserve.org/library/birdDistributionmapsmetadatav1.pdf.

Full metadata for the Mammal Range Maps of North America is available at:
http://www.natureserve.org/library/mammalsDistributionmetadatav1.pdf.

Restrictions on Use: Permission to use, copy and distribute documents delivered from this server is hereby granted under the following conditions:
  1. The above copyright notice must appear in all copies;
  2. Any use of the documents available from this server must be for informational purposes only and in no instance for commercial purposes;
  3. Some data may be downloaded to files and altered in format for analytical purposes, however the data should still be referenced using the citation above;
  4. No graphics available from this server can be used, copied or distributed separate from the accompanying text. Any rights not expressly granted herein are reserved by NatureServe. Nothing contained herein shall be construed as conferring by implication, estoppel, or otherwise any license or right under any trademark of NatureServe. No trademark owned by NatureServe may be used in advertising or promotion pertaining to the distribution of documents delivered from this server without specific advance permission from NatureServe. Except as expressly provided above, nothing contained herein shall be construed as conferring any license or right under any NatureServe copyright.
Information Warranty Disclaimer: All documents and related graphics provided by this server and any other documents which are referenced by or linked to this server are provided "as is" without warranty as to the currentness, completeness, or accuracy of any specific data. NatureServe hereby disclaims all warranties and conditions with regard to any documents provided by this server or any other documents which are referenced by or linked to this server, including but not limited to all implied warranties and conditions of merchantibility, fitness for a particular purpose, and non-infringement. NatureServe makes no representations about the suitability of the information delivered from this server or any other documents that are referenced to or linked to this server. In no event shall NatureServe be liable for any special, indirect, incidental, consequential damages, or for damages of any kind arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information contained in any documents provided by this server or in any other documents which are referenced by or linked to this server, under any theory of liability used. NatureServe may update or make changes to the documents provided by this server at any time without notice; however, NatureServe makes no commitment to update the information contained herein. Since the data in the central databases are continually being updated, it is advisable to refresh data retrieved at least once a year after its receipt. The data provided is for planning, assessment, and informational purposes. Site specific projects or activities should be reviewed for potential environmental impacts with appropriate regulatory agencies. If ground-disturbing activities are proposed on a site, the appropriate state natural heritage program(s) or conservation data center can be contacted for a site-specific review of the project area (see Visit Local Programs).

Feedback Request: NatureServe encourages users to let us know of any errors or significant omissions that you find in the data through (see Contact Us). Your comments will be very valuable in improving the overall quality of our databases for the benefit of all users.