Cuscuta epithymum - L.
Clover Dodder
Taxonomic Status: Accepted
Related ITIS Name(s): Cuscuta epithymum (L.) L. (TSN 30729)
Unique Identifier: ELEMENT_GLOBAL.2.144389
Element Code: PDCUS010K0
Informal Taxonomy: Plants, Vascular - Flowering Plants - Dodder Family
 
Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family Genus
Plantae Anthophyta Dicotyledoneae Solanales Cuscutaceae Cuscuta
Check this box to expand all report sections:
Concept Reference
Help
Concept Reference: Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
Concept Reference Code: B94KAR01HQUS
Name Used in Concept Reference: Cuscuta epithymum
Conservation Status
Help

NatureServe Status

Global Status: GNR
Global Status Last Changed: 22Mar1994
Rounded Global Status: GNR - Not Yet Ranked
Nation: United States
National Status: NNA
Nation: Canada
National Status: NNA (22Mar1994)

U.S. & Canada State/Province Status
United States California (SNA), Connecticut (SNA), Iowa (SNA), Kentucky (SNA), Maine (SNA), Maryland (SNA), Massachusetts (SNR), Michigan (SNA), Missouri (SNA), Montana (SNA), Nebraska (SNA), Nevada (SNA), New Jersey (SNA), New Mexico (SNA), New York (SNA), North Dakota (SNA), Ohio (SNA), Oregon (SNA), Pennsylvania (SNA), Rhode Island (SNA), South Dakota (SNA), Vermont (SNA), Virginia (SNA), Washington (SNA), West Virginia (SNA), Wyoming (SNA)
Canada British Columbia (SNA), New Brunswick (SNA), Ontario (SNA)

Other Statuses

NatureServe Global Conservation Status Factors

Other NatureServe Conservation Status Information

Distribution
Help
U.S. States and Canadian Provinces
Color legend for Distribution Map
NOTE: The distribution shown may be incomplete, particularly for some rapidly spreading exotic species.

U.S. & Canada State/Province Distribution
United States CAexotic, CTexotic, IAexotic, KYexotic, MA, MDexotic, MEexotic, MIexotic, MOexotic, MTexotic, NDexotic, NEexotic, NJexotic, NMexotic, NVexotic, NYexotic, OHexotic, ORexotic, PAexotic, RIexotic, SDexotic, VAexotic, VTexotic, WAexotic, WVexotic, WYexotic
Canada BCexotic, NBexotic, ONexotic

Range Map
No map available.

Ecology & Life History Not yet assessed
Help
Economic Attributes Not yet assessed
Help
Management Summary Not yet assessed
Help
Population/Occurrence Delineation Not yet assessed
Help
Population/Occurrence Viability
Help
U.S. Invasive Species Impact Rank (I-Rank)
Help
Disclaimer: While I-Rank information is available over NatureServe Explorer, NatureServe is not actively developing or maintaining these data. Species with I-RANKs do not represent a random sample of species exotic in the United States; available assessments may be biased toward those species with higher-than-average impact.

I-Rank: Medium/Insignificant
Rounded I-Rank: Unknown
I-Rank Reasons Summary: Dodders can negatively affect individual host plants, sometimes killing them. Dodders are also widespread and difficult to eradicate. However, they primarily invade lower quality disturbed native habitats and agricultural croplands.
Subrank I - Ecological Impact: Low/Insignificant
Subrank II - Current Distribution/Abundance: High/Medium
Subrank III - Trend in Distribution/Abundance: Medium/Insignificant
Subrank IV - Management Difficulty: High/Medium
I-Rank Review Date: 18May2004
Evaluator: Fellows, M.
Native anywhere in the U.S?
Native Range: Northern Africa, Temperate Asia, Middle East and Europe.

Download "An Invasive Species Assessment Protocol: Evaluating Non-Native Plants for their Impact on Biodiversity". (PDF, 1.03MB)
Provide feedback on the information presented in this assessment

Screening Questions

S-1. Established outside cultivation as a non-native? YES
Comments: (Kartesz 1999).

S-2. Present in conservation areas or other native species habitat? Yes
Comments: (WNPS 1997).

Subrank I - Ecological Impact: Low/Insignificant

1. Impact on Ecosystem Processes and System-wide Parameters:Low significance/Insignificant
Comments: No ecosystem effects have been reported, therefore inferred to have a low or insignificant effect.

2. Impact on Ecological Community Structure:Medium/Low significance
Comments: Inferred - a vine that can be dense enough to smother the plant(s) it is climbing on (FLORIDATA 2004).

3. Impact on Ecological Community Composition:Medium/Low significance
Comments: Inferred - In a 2000 study in Slovakia, C. epithymum was found to parasitize crop plants (alfalfa) and some crop weeds - however, it has been shown to grow on up to 91 different hosts (Toth and Cagan 2001). May spread phytoplasma ('yellows disease') (Swift 2003).

4. Impact on Individual Native Plant or Animal Species:Unknown

5. Conservation Significance of the Communities and Native Species Threatened:Insignificant
Comments: Generally in disturbed areas (FLORIDATA 2004).

Subrank II. Current Distribution and Abundance: High/Medium

6. Current Range Size in Nation:High significance
Comments: Scattered and disjunct distribution in U.S., total area greater than 1/3, but from east to west coast, north to south borders (Kartesz 1999).

7. Proportion of Current Range Where the Species is Negatively Impacting Biodiversity:Medium/Low significance
Comments: Kartesz (1999) lists Cuscuta epithymum as "noxious" in 5 of the 26 states, including California and Nevada. However, this is primarily an indication of the economic damage Cuscuta species in general can cause in agricultural situations. The degree of negative impacts to native plants and animals in more natural situations is uncertain. In Slovakia, this speices is found exclusively on alfalpha and incidentally on weeds growing the this crop (Toth and Cagan 2001) but it is found in old fields and the edges of woods in Pennsylvania (Rhoades and Klein 1995).

8. Proportion of Nation's Biogeographic Units Invaded:High significance
Comments: Given the wide distribution in Kartesz (1999), the species could occur in 55 eocregions - inferred from TNC (2001).

9. Diversity of Habitats or Ecological Systems Invaded in Nation:Low significance
Comments: Generally in disturbed areas (FLORIDATA 2004).

Subrank III. Trend in Distribution and Abundance: Medium/Insignificant

10. Current Trend in Total Range within Nation:Low significance/Insignificant
Comments: May spread slowly if at all (WNPS 1997).

11. Proportion of Potential Range Currently Occupied:Low significance
Comments: Inferred.

12. Long-distance Dispersal Potential within Nation:High/Moderate significance
Comments: Inadvertantly harvested and distributed with host plant, spread in hay, soil, water or animal manure (FLORIDATA 2004).

13. Local Range Expansion or Change in Abundance:Unknown

14. Inherent Ability to Invade Conservation Areas and Other Native Species Habitats:Low significance/Insignificant
Comments: WNPS list B, wildland weed with low potential to spread (WNPS 1997).

15. Similar Habitats Invaded Elsewhere:Low significance
Comments: Present in Canada (Kartesz 1999).

16. Reproductive Characteristics:Moderate significance
Comments: Cuscuta spp. may produce 1000's of seed/plant which contribute to a long-lived seed bank, broken stems readily reattach to new hosts (FLORIDATA 2004).

Subrank IV. General Management Difficulty: High/Medium

17. General Management Difficulty:Moderate significance
Comments: Not easy - remove and burn all stems to prevent reinvasion(FLORIDATA 2004).

18. Minimum Time Commitment:High significance
Comments: Inferred long lived (~20+ years) seed bank.

19. Impacts of Management on Native Species:Moderate significance
Comments: Difficult to apply herbicides without killing vegetation underneath (Toth and Cagan 2001). Many rare Cuscuta spp. combined with the difficulty in determining which is a rare native vs. a common non-native could harm the rare natives(FLORIDATA 2004).

20. Accessibility of Invaded Areas:Unknown
Authors/Contributors
Help

Botanical data developed by NatureServe and its network of natural heritage programs (see Local Programs), The North Carolina Botanical Garden, and other contributors and cooperators (see Sources).

References
Help
  • Floridata. 2004.10266 Rebel Circle, Tallahassee, Florida 32305. ONLINE www.floridata.com. Accessed, 2004.

  • Kartesz, J.T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 2nd edition. 2 vols. Timber Press, Portland, OR.

  • Kartesz, J.T. 1999. A synonymized checklist and atlas with biological attributes for the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. First edition. In: Kartesz, J.T., and C.A. Meacham. Synthesis of the North American Flora, Version 1.0. North Carolina Botanical Garden, Chapel Hill, N.C.

  • Rhoads, A.F., and W.M. Klein, Jr. 1993. The vascular flora of Pennsylvania: Annotated checklist and atlas. American Philosophical Society, Philadelphia, PA. 636 pp.

  • Swift, C. J. 1996 (updated 2003). Cuscuta and Grammica species - Dodder A Plant Parasite. Colorado State University Cooperative Extension. ONLINE www.colostate.edu/Depts/CoopExt/TRA/dodder.html. Accessed 2004, February.

  • The Nature Conservancy. 2001. Map: TNC Ecoregions of the United States. Modification of Bailey Ecoregions. Online . Accessed May 2003.

  • Toth, P. and L. Cagan. 2001. Spread of dodder (Cuscuta spp._ in the agroecosystems of Slovakia: Is it an emerging problem?. Proceedings of the International Scientific Coference on the Occasion of the 55th Anniversary of the Slovak Agriculutal Univerisity in Nitra, Acta fytotechnica et zootechnica, 4:117-120.

  • USDA, ARS, National Genetic Resources Program. 2001. Germplasm Resources Information Network - (GRIN). [Online Database]. National Germplasm Resources Laboratory, Beltsville, Maryland.URL: http://www.ars-grin.gov/var/apache/cgi-bin/npgs/html/taxon.pl?6438. (Accessed 2004)

  • Washington Native Plant Society (WNPS). 1997. Preliminary List of Exotic Pest Plants of Greatest Ecological Concern in Oregon and Washington. ONLINE. http://www.wnps.org/eppclist.html. Accessed 2004, January.

Use Guidelines & Citation

Use Guidelines and Citation

The Small Print: Trademark, Copyright, Citation Guidelines, Restrictions on Use, and Information Disclaimer.

Note: All species and ecological community data presented in NatureServe Explorer at http://explorer.natureserve.org were updated to be current with NatureServe's central databases as of November 2016.
Note: This report was printed on

Trademark Notice: "NatureServe", NatureServe Explorer, The NatureServe logo, and all other names of NatureServe programs referenced herein are trademarks of NatureServe. Any other product or company names mentioned herein are the trademarks of their respective owners.

Copyright Notice: Copyright © 2017 NatureServe, 4600 N. Fairfax Dr., 7th Floor, Arlington Virginia 22203, U.S.A. All Rights Reserved. Each document delivered from this server or web site may contain other proprietary notices and copyright information relating to that document. The following citation should be used in any published materials which reference the web site.

Citation for data on website including State Distribution, Watershed, and Reptile Range maps:
NatureServe. 2017. NatureServe Explorer: An online encyclopedia of life [web application]. Version 7.1. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia. Available http://explorer.natureserve.org. (Accessed:

Citation for Bird Range Maps of North America:
Ridgely, R.S., T.F. Allnutt, T. Brooks, D.K. McNicol, D.W. Mehlman, B.E. Young, and J.R. Zook. 2003. Digital Distribution Maps of the Birds of the Western Hemisphere, version 1.0. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia, USA.

Acknowledgement Statement for Bird Range Maps of North America:
"Data provided by NatureServe in collaboration with Robert Ridgely, James Zook, The Nature Conservancy - Migratory Bird Program, Conservation International - CABS, World Wildlife Fund - US, and Environment Canada - WILDSPACE."

Citation for Mammal Range Maps of North America:
Patterson, B.D., G. Ceballos, W. Sechrest, M.F. Tognelli, T. Brooks, L. Luna, P. Ortega, I. Salazar, and B.E. Young. 2003. Digital Distribution Maps of the Mammals of the Western Hemisphere, version 1.0. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia, USA.

Acknowledgement Statement for Mammal Range Maps of North America:
"Data provided by NatureServe in collaboration with Bruce Patterson, Wes Sechrest, Marcelo Tognelli, Gerardo Ceballos, The Nature Conservancy-Migratory Bird Program, Conservation International-CABS, World Wildlife Fund-US, and Environment Canada-WILDSPACE."

Citation for Amphibian Range Maps of the Western Hemisphere:
IUCN, Conservation International, and NatureServe. 2004. Global Amphibian Assessment. IUCN, Conservation International, and NatureServe, Washington, DC and Arlington, Virginia, USA.

Acknowledgement Statement for Amphibian Range Maps of the Western Hemisphere:
"Data developed as part of the Global Amphibian Assessment and provided by IUCN-World Conservation Union, Conservation International and NatureServe."

NOTE: Full metadata for the Bird Range Maps of North America is available at:
http://www.natureserve.org/library/birdDistributionmapsmetadatav1.pdf.

Full metadata for the Mammal Range Maps of North America is available at:
http://www.natureserve.org/library/mammalsDistributionmetadatav1.pdf.

Restrictions on Use: Permission to use, copy and distribute documents delivered from this server is hereby granted under the following conditions:
  1. The above copyright notice must appear in all copies;
  2. Any use of the documents available from this server must be for informational purposes only and in no instance for commercial purposes;
  3. Some data may be downloaded to files and altered in format for analytical purposes, however the data should still be referenced using the citation above;
  4. No graphics available from this server can be used, copied or distributed separate from the accompanying text. Any rights not expressly granted herein are reserved by NatureServe. Nothing contained herein shall be construed as conferring by implication, estoppel, or otherwise any license or right under any trademark of NatureServe. No trademark owned by NatureServe may be used in advertising or promotion pertaining to the distribution of documents delivered from this server without specific advance permission from NatureServe. Except as expressly provided above, nothing contained herein shall be construed as conferring any license or right under any NatureServe copyright.
Information Warranty Disclaimer: All documents and related graphics provided by this server and any other documents which are referenced by or linked to this server are provided "as is" without warranty as to the currentness, completeness, or accuracy of any specific data. NatureServe hereby disclaims all warranties and conditions with regard to any documents provided by this server or any other documents which are referenced by or linked to this server, including but not limited to all implied warranties and conditions of merchantibility, fitness for a particular purpose, and non-infringement. NatureServe makes no representations about the suitability of the information delivered from this server or any other documents that are referenced to or linked to this server. In no event shall NatureServe be liable for any special, indirect, incidental, consequential damages, or for damages of any kind arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information contained in any documents provided by this server or in any other documents which are referenced by or linked to this server, under any theory of liability used. NatureServe may update or make changes to the documents provided by this server at any time without notice; however, NatureServe makes no commitment to update the information contained herein. Since the data in the central databases are continually being updated, it is advisable to refresh data retrieved at least once a year after its receipt. The data provided is for planning, assessment, and informational purposes. Site specific projects or activities should be reviewed for potential environmental impacts with appropriate regulatory agencies. If ground-disturbing activities are proposed on a site, the appropriate state natural heritage program(s) or conservation data center can be contacted for a site-specific review of the project area (see Visit Local Programs).

Feedback Request: NatureServe encourages users to let us know of any errors or significant omissions that you find in the data through (see Contact Us). Your comments will be very valuable in improving the overall quality of our databases for the benefit of all users.